Cited by 125Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Estimating Dopamine D2 Receptor Occupancy for Doses of 8 Antipsychotics: A Meta-Analysis

Lako, Irene M., van den Heuvel, Edwin R., Knegtering, Henrikus, Bruggeman, Richard, Taxis, Katja·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

RATIONALE: Dose equivalents based on dopamine D₂ receptor occupancy can be used to compare antipsychotics on D₂ receptor-mediated (adverse) effects such as extrapyramidal symptoms and altered emotional experiences. Previous meta-analyses modeling the dose-occupancy relationship hardly addressed potential heterogeneity of the imaging data. OBJECTIVES: To model the relationship between dose and D₂ receptor occupancy for a series of frequently prescribed antipsychotics while addressing the potential heterogeneity of the imaging data. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis on published D₂ receptor occupancy data (positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography) in patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics. A nonlinear mixed effects model estimated the median D₂ receptor occupancy for a given antipsychotic dose. Heterogeneity between studies was investigated by incorporating study as a random effect in the model, in addition to patient- and study-specific explanatory variables. RESULTS: Included were 51 studies, describing 606 patients (mean ± SD age, 32.2 ±10.8 years; 25.7% female). The models described the dose-occupancy relationship with narrow confidence bands around the therapeutic dose range. Maximum occupancy (95% confidence interval[CI]) was estimated for haloperidol (91.9%; 95% CI, 86.1-97.8), risperidone(92.4%; 95% CI, 81.8-100), olanzapine (96.5%; 95% CI,85.8-100), clozapine (61.7%; 95% CI, 49.2-74.2), quetiapine (49.1%; 95% CI, 18.7-79.6), aripiprazole (86.9%; 95% CI, 78.2-95.7), ziprasidone (82.9%; 95% CI, 44.9-100), and amisulpride (85.0%; 95% CI, 68.5-100). Interindividual differences explained most of the variability in occupancy values, besides significant heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-occupancy functions estimated the median level of dopamine D₂ receptor occupancy for 8 frequently prescribed antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. These dose equivalents can be used to compare antipsychotic effects in epidemiological studies and clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3182983ffa

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PET imaging demonstrates a hyperbolic relationship between doses of antipsychotic and D2 receptor blockade.

    “Furthermore, PET imaging demonstrates a hyperbolic relationship between doses of antipsychotic and D2 receptor blockade.”
  • Linear decrements of 10 percentage point D2 receptor occupancy from 90% for haloperidol require hyperbolic dose reductions.

    “Linear decrements of, eg, 10 percentage point D2 receptor occupancy from 90% for haloperidol require hyperbolic dose reductions (table 3b; decrements of 20 percentage points in figure 2c), with further medications shown in table 4 and supplementary tables S3–S11.”
  • Taking the example of haloperidol, linear dose reductions from therapeutic doses of 4 mg produce increasingly large reductions in percentage points of D2 dopamine antagonism: 3.5 percentage points (4 to 3 mg), 6.1 percentage points (3 to 2 mg), 13.7 percentage points (2 to 1 mg), and 55.7 percentage points (1 to 0 mg).

    “Taking the example of haloperidol (figure 2 and table 3a),91 it is notable that linear dose reductions from therapeutic doses of 4 mg produce increasingly large reductions in percentage points of D2 dopamine antagonism: 3.5 percentage points (4 to 3 mg), 6.1 percentage points (3 to 2 mg), 13.7 percentage points (2 to 1 mg), and 55.7 percentage points (1 to 0 mg; figure 2b and table 3a).”
  • Even reductions from 0.5 mg of haloperidol to 0 mg will produce a reduction in D2 antagonism of 40.0 percentage points, and reduction from 0.25 mg to 0 mg will produce a 25.5 percentage point reduction (larger than the change from 20 to 2 mg [19.6 percentage points]).

    “Indeed, even reductions from 0.5 mg of haloperidol (the smallest available tablet) to 0 mg will produce a reduction in D2 antagonism of 40.0 percentage points, and reduction from 0.25 mg (half the smallest tablet) to 0 mg will produce a 25.5 percentage point reduction (larger than the change from 20 to 2 mg [19.6 percentage points]);”
  • There is some heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of PET studies indicating the likelihood of interindividual differences in receptor occupancy for a given dose, emphasizing the importance of individualized tapering guided by the patient's response to reductions.

    “It should also be noted that there is some heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of PET studies91 indicating the likelihood of interindividual differences in receptor occupancy for a given dose, emphasizing the importance of individualized tapering guided by the patient’s response to reductions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lako, I. M., van den Heuvel, E. R., Knegtering, H., Bruggeman, R., & Taxis, K.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Lako, Irene M.
  • Bruggeman, Richard
  • Taxis, Katja
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2013-10
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
675-681
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136998407
Cited by
125
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor occupancy, antipsychotic drugs, schizophrenia, haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, amisulpride, dose equivalent, extrapyramidal symptoms, nonlinear mixed-effects models
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Protein Binding, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Nonlinear Dynamics, Dopamine Antagonists, Positron-Emission Tomography, Young Adult, Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review