Cited by 31Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Practice in a Community Care Unit: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

A recovery-oriented model of care has become the major focus of mental health service delivery in the state of Victoria, Australia. However, there is a total absence of knowledge of recovery-oriented mental health practice in community care units (CCUs). Therefore, the aims of this exploratory study were to: (a) describe what aspects of the current model of care fit within the domains of recovery; and (b) describe the pragmatic processes that staff use to mold their care within the domains of recovery. Twenty-one key stakeholders provided informed voluntary consent to participate in one-to-one interviews. Six content domains evolved to include: (a) a common vision: "a continuous journey"; (b) promoting hope; (c) promoting autonomy and self-determination; (d) meaningful engagement; (e) holistic and personalized care; and (f) community participation and citizenship. The CCU appeared to be on a journey of transformation toward personal recovery. However, clinicians were grappling with an identified tension among personal recovery and clinical recovery. The tension among personal recovery and clinical recovery may be attributed to the psychosocial rehabilitation model of care, which was previously systemic in Victorian CCUs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000127

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
McKenna, B., Oakes, J., Fourniotis, N., Toomey, N., & Furness, T.
Affiliations
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
McKenna, Brian
Venue
Journal of Forensic Nursing
Published
2016-10
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
167-175
ISSN
  • 1556-3693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3938
OpenAlex
W2544921446
Cited by
31
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
community care unit, forensic mental health services, personal recovery, clinical recovery, psychosocial rehabilitation, hope, autonomy and self-determination, meaningful engagement, community participation, holistic care, models of care, Victoria, Australia
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Holistic Health, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Motivation, Group Homes, Personal Autonomy, Community Integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review