Cited by 3,038Mental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health and PsychiatryPsychiatric care and mental health services

Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis

Open access
Leamy, Mary, Bird, Victoria, Boutillier, Clair Le, Williams, Julie, Slade, Mike·2011·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: No systematic review and narrative synthesis on personal recovery in mental illness has been undertaken. Aims: To synthesise published descriptions and models of personal recovery into an empirically based conceptual framework. Method: Systematic review and modified narrative synthesis. Results: Out of 5208 papers that were identified and 366 that were reviewed, a total of 97 papers were included in this review. The emergent conceptual framework consists of: (a) 13 characteristics of the recovery journey; (b) five recovery processes comprising: connectedness; hope and optimism about the future; identity; meaning in life; and empowerment (giving the acronym CHIME); and (c) recovery stage descriptions which mapped onto the transtheoretical model of change. Studies that focused on recovery for individuals of Black and minority ethnic (BME) origin showed a greater emphasis on spirituality and stigma and also identified two additional themes: culturally specific facilitating factors and collectivist notions of recovery. Conclusions: The conceptual framework is a theoretically defensible and robust synthesis of people's experiences of recovery in mental illness. This provides an empirical basis for future recovery-oriented research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants describe acute inpatient mental health settings as inhumane and not beneficial to recovery, as they felt they had no control or say on their treatment.

    “Participants describe acute inpatient mental health settings as inhumane and are not beneficial to recovery as they felt they had no control or say on their treatment (Care Quality Commission, 2017; Leamy et al., 2011 ).”

    From A qualitative synthesis of patients' experiences of re-traumatization in acute mental health inpatient settings (2023) · cites this paper as Leamy et al., 2011

    The Discussion identifies empowerment as a recovery process, and Future research calls for clinical interactions that promote empowerment and self-management. Those passages support the importance of having a say in recovery, but they do not report participants describing acute inpatient settings as inhumane or not beneficial to recovery because they lacked control over treatment. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), recovery frameworks, and understandings of cognition and motivation provided the foundation of time use scholarship and practice in the mental health field.

    “The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF, 86), recovery frameworks (80, 87, 88), and understandings of cognition and motivation provided the foundation of time use scholarship and practice in the mental health field.”

    From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [87]

    The paper develops a conceptual framework for personal recovery and says it can orient mental health research and clinical practice (Implications for research and practice; Future research). It does not establish that recovery frameworks provided a foundation for time-use scholarship or practice; the ICF and cognition-and-motivation elements are attributed to other sources or left uncited in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Being connected with others and having role models can be a significant aspect of the recovery process.

    “Being connected with others and having role models can be a significant aspect of the recovery process (Leamy et al., 2011)”

    From "What an eye-opener" - a qualitative study of vulnerable citizens participating in a municipality-based intervention. (2018) · cites this paper as Leamy et al., 2011

    The Results and Discussion identify connectedness as a key process in personal recovery, and Future research discusses access to peer support. The passages found do not specifically identify having role models as an aspect of recovery (searched: role models, role modelling). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The process of Hope and optimism for the future during recovery is related to interpersonal relationships, which can inspire hope and should also include having role models.

    “The process of Hope and optimism for the future during recovery is also related to interpersonal relationships, which can inspire hope and should also include having role models (Leamy et al., 2011)”

    From "What an eye-opener" - a qualitative study of vulnerable citizens participating in a municipality-based intervention. (2018) · cites this paper as Leamy et al., 2011

    The Results and Discussion identify both connectedness and hope and optimism about the future as recovery processes, and Future research discusses access to peer support. The passages do not say that interpersonal relationships inspire hope or that recovery should include role models; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The participants valued their experiences of success, which is an important element in the recovery process.

    “The participants valued their experiences of success, which is an important element in the recovery process (Leamy et al., 2011).”

    From "What an eye-opener" - a qualitative study of vulnerable citizens participating in a municipality-based intervention. (2018) · cites this paper as Leamy et al., 2011

    Table 3 (page not provided) includes successful occupational performance in one model of recovery stages, and the Future research section calls for attention to people's strengths. These passages offer limited support for linking success with recovery, but the paper does not establish that experiences of success generally are an important element of the recovery process. The statement about the citing paper's participants is its own observation, not a finding attributed to Leamy et al. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Drake RE, Deegan P. Are assertive community treatment and recovery compatible? Community Ment Health J 2008; 44: 75-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leamy, M., Bird, V., Boutillier, C. L., Williams, J., & Slade, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Leamy, Mary
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-12
Volume
199
Issue
6
Pages
445-452
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2127263830
Cited by
3,038
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 319 · 2025: 324 · 2024: 280 · 2023: 285 · 2022: 307 · 2021: 297 · 2020: 261 · 2019: 222 · 2018: 184 · 2017: 179 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 26
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0707-10040, 10040)
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
personal recovery, mental illness, conceptual framework, recovery journey, connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning in life, empowerment, transtheoretical model, recovery stages, spirituality, stigma, Black and minority ethnic people
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Concept Formation, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Minority Groups, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Self Concept, Recovery of Function, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review