Cited by 9Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resilience Room Use and Its Effect on Distress Among Nurses and Allied Staff

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Nationwide nursing shortages have spurred nursing research on burnout and resiliency to better understand the emotional health of nurses and allied staff to retain talent. Our institution implemented resilience rooms in the neuroscience units of our hospital. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of resilience room use on emotional distress among staff. METHODS: Resilience rooms opened to staff in the neuroscience tower in January 2021. Entrances were electronically captured via badge readers. Upon exit, staff completed a survey containing items on demographics, burnout, and emotional distress. RESULTS: Resilience rooms were used 1988 times, and 396 surveys were completed. Rooms were most used by intensive care unit nurses (40.1% of entrances), followed by nurse leaders (28.8%). Staff with >10 years of experience accounted for 50.8% of uses. One-third reported moderate burnout, and 15.9% reported heavy or extreme burnout. Overall, emotional distress decreased by 49.4% from entrance to exit. The greatest decreases in distress were recorded by those with the lowest levels of burnout (72.5% decrease). CONCLUSION: Resilience room use was associated with significant decreases in emotional distress. The greatest decreases occurred with the lowest levels of burnout, suggesting that early engagement with resilience rooms is most beneficial.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000701

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beyond structured training programs, various other individual-level workplace interventions may contribute to strengthening resilience.

    “Beyond structured training programs, there are various other individual-level workplace interventions that may contribute to strengthening resilience (91–96).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2019, Relaxation rooms: combating mental, emotional, and physical fatigue in a healthcare setting, Arizona Nurse, 72, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Prendergast, V., Elmasry, S., Juhl, N. A., & Chapple, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
  • Creighton University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Published
2023-06
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
80-85
ISSN
  • 0888-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2810
OpenAlex
W4366371762
Cited by
9
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
emotional distress, burnout, nurses, allied health professionals, intensive care unit nurses, nurse leaders, employee well-being, nursing shortage
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review