Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave
Abstract
Background: The nursing shortage is a critical issue in many countries. High turnover rates among nurses is contributing to the shortage, and job dissatisfaction, intention to leave, and burnout have been identified as some of the predictors of nurse turnover. A well‐established body of evidence demonstrates that the work environment for nurses influences nurse job dissatisfaction, intention to leave, and burnout, but there never has been a study undertaken in Thailand to investigate this relationship. Objectives: To investigate how work environment affects job dissatisfaction, burnout, and intention to leave among nurses in Thailand. Methods: The study used a cross‐sectional survey to collect data from 1351 nurses working in 43 inpatient units in five university hospitals across Thailand. The participants completed the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and measures of job dissatisfaction and intention to leave. Logistical regression models assessed the association between work environment and nurse‐reported job dissatisfaction, burnout, and intent to leave. Results: Nurses working in university hospitals with better work environments had significantly less job dissatisfaction, intention to leave, and burnout. Conclusion: The nurse work environment is a significant feature contributing to nurse retention in Thai university hospitals. Implications for nursing and health policy: Improving the work environment for nurses may lead to lower levels of job dissatisfaction, intention to leave, and burnout. Focusing on these nurse outcomes can be used as a strategy to retain nurses in the healthcare system. Addressing the challenges of poor work environments requires coordinated action from policymakers and health managers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The better rated the work environment, the lower the likelihood of experiencing Emotional Exhaustion.
“Five studies comprising diverse samples and settings concluded that the better rated the work environment, the lower the likelihood of experiencing Emotional Exhaustion [32, 47, 49, 51, 92]”
From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review.
Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Galanis, P., Vraka, I., Fragkou, D., Bilali, A., & Kaitelidou, D. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14839 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Lake, E. T., Sanders, J., Duan, R., Riman, K. A., Schoenauer, K. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001109 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Lee, H.-F., Chiang, H.-Y., & Kuo, H.-T. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12648 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Cole, A., Ali, H., Ahmed, A., Hamasha, M., & Jordan, S. (2021) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s308397 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
McIntyre, N., Crilly, J., & Elder, E. (2024) · International Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101437 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Visiers-Jiménez, L., Kuokkanen, L., Leino-Kilpi, H., Löyttyniemi, E., Turjamaa, R., Brugnolli, A., Gaspar, F., Nemcová, J., Palese, A., Rua, M., et al. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10050754 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Resilience room use and its effect on distress among nurses and allied staff
Prendergast, V., Elmasry, S., Juhl, N. A., & Chapple, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · doi:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000701 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nantsupawat, A., Kunaviktikul, W., Nantsupawat, R., Wichaikhum, O. ‐., Thienthong, H., & Poghosyan, L.
- Affiliations
- Chiang Mai University (TH)
- Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (TH)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nantsupawat, A.
- Venue
- International Nursing Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-24
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 0020-8132 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-7657
- OpenAlex
- W2552485148
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 44.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Nursing Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chiang Mai University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- nursing work environment, job dissatisfaction, burnout, turnover intention, nurse turnover, nurse retention, nursing shortage, university hospital, Thailand
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Care, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Turnover, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thailand, Organizational Culture, Logistic Models, Workplace, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review