Cited by 27Gender and Technology in EducationDigital literacy in educationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

An Investigation Into the Attitudes of Nursing Students Toward Technology

Tubaishat, Ahmad·2014·Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attitudes toward technology may impact the levels of technology acceptance and training willingness among nursing students. Nurse acceptance and effective utilization of technology are critical to improving patient care and safety. PURPOSE: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to measurethe attitude of nursing students toward technology and to determine if demographic characteristics affect their attitudinal measures. Furthermore, the amount of formal education provided on the use of technology applications is explored. METHODS: A convenience sample of nursing students attending a public university in Jordan was recruited, and a technology attitude scale designed to measure the attitude of nursing students toward technology was used. Scales designed to gather data on participant demographics, self-reported technology skills, and level of formal technology education were also used. RESULTS: The results showed that participants held a positive attitude toward technology. Students who reported a high level of technology skill had the most positive attitude toward technology. The impact years of formal education on the use of technology applications were low, whereas academic level had a significant impact on technology attitudes. Senior student participants had the highest level of technology education, likely because of their exposure to relatively more educational opportunities, and the most positive attitude toward technology. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive attitude of nursing students toward technology, the problem of minimal technology education should be addressed in future nursing programs to further enhance positive attitudes toward technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Authors
Tubaishat, A.
Affiliations
Al al-Bayt University (JO)
Corresponding author
Tubaishat, Ahmad
Venue
Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2014-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
119-125
ISSN
1682-3141 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984412018
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
nursing students, attitudes toward technology, technology acceptance, technological competence, demographic factors, academic level, nursing education, nursing care technology
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Computers, Computer Literacy, Computer User Training, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Jordan, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Universities, Nursing Education Research, Nursing Informatics, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review