Cited by 60Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentWorkplace Health and Well-being

A substance use cost calculator for US employers with an emphasis on prescription pain medication misuse.

Open access
Goplerud, Eric, Hodge, Sarah, Benham, Tess·2017·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Substance use disorders are among the most common and costly health conditions affecting Americans. Despite estimates of national costs exceeding $400 billion annually, individual companies may not see how substance use impacts their bottom lines through lost productivity and absenteeism, turnover, health care expenses, disability, and workers' compensation. METHODS: Data on employed adults (18 years and older) from 3 years (2012 to 2014) of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Public Use Data Files were analyzed. RESULTS: The results offer employers an authoritative, free, epidemiologically grounded, and easy-to-use tool that gives specific information about how alcohol, prescription pain medication misuse, and illicit drug use is likely impacting workplaces like theirs. CONCLUSION: Employers have detailed reports of the cost of substance use that can be used to improve workplace policies and health benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0000000000001157

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The estimated cost of any SUD diagnosis includes people with multiple SUD diagnoses and may be more meaningful than individual SUD type results.

    “The estimated cost of any SUD diagnosis ($15 640 per affected enrollee and $35.3 billion in the ESI population) includes people with multiple SUD diagnoses and may be more meaningful than individual SUD type results; survey data suggest 40% of workers with illicit drug use disorders had comorbid alcohol use disorder.5”

    From Medical Costs of Substance Use Disorders in the US Employer-Sponsored Insurance Population (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results section, under “Comorbid Substance Use” (page unavailable), reports that workers with SUDs often have more than one disorder, including that four in 10 workers with an illicit drug use disorder also had an alcohol use disorder. This supports the concern about overlapping diagnoses, but the paper does not establish that an ESI-population cost estimate for any SUD is more meaningful than estimates by SUD type. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous estimates of SUD medical costs among US employees relied on workers' self-reported health care utilization.

    “Previous estimates of SUD medical costs among US employees are well described but relied on workers’ self-reported health care utilization.5”
  • Survey data suggest 40% of workers with illicit drug use disorders had comorbid alcohol use disorder.

    “survey data suggest 40% of workers with illicit drug use disorders had comorbid alcohol use disorder.5”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [6]Harwood HJ Reichman MB The cost to employers of employee alcohol abuse: a review of the literature in the United States of America. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Bull Narcotics 2000.
  2. [8]Holder HD Lennox RD Blose JO The economic benefits of alcoholism treatment: a summary of twenty years of research. J Employee Assist Res 1992; 1: 63– 82.
  3. [9]Center for Behavioral Health Statistics Quality. Impact of the DSM-IV to DSM-5 Changes on the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016. 30199183
  4. [10]Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral Health Barometer: United States, 2014. HHS Publication No. SMA-15-4895. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2015. 33734652
  5. [21]Fayer SD Agriculture: occupational employment and wages. Monthly Lab Rev 2014; 137:1. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2014/article/agriculture-occupational-employment-and-wages.htm Accessed September 4, 2017.
  6. [34]Tracey JB Hinkin TR Contextual factors and cost profiles associated with employee turnover. Cornell Hosp Quart 2008; 49: 12– 27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goplerud, E., Hodge, S., & Benham, T.
Affiliations
National Safety Council (US)
Corresponding author
Goplerud, Eric
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2017-11
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1063-1071
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757594278
Cited by
60
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, workplace productivity loss, absenteeism, employee turnover, workers' compensation, occupational health policy, health benefits
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Driving Under the Influence, Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Analgesics, Anxiety, Depression, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Resources, Health Surveys, Hospitalization, Humans, Industry, Male, Middle Aged, Personnel Turnover, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Health Care Costs, Workplace, Sick Leave, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Prescription Drugs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review