Cited by 7Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureOccupational exposure and asthmaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Continuum of Severity of Functional Impairment Due to Indoor Air Symptoms: Prevalence and Determinants

Open access
Eidstø, Einar, Selinheimo, Sanna, Lampi, Jussi, Salmela, Anniina, Pekkanen, Juha·2023·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to study functional impairment due to indoor air–related symptoms and associated characteristics. Methods: A questionnaire survey of a random sample of Finnish people aged 25 to 64 years. Analyses were done using multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Results: A total of 23.1% reported indoor air–related symptoms, 1.8% severe functional impairment due to symptoms, 5.3% moderate, 11.1% mild, and 4.9% reported no impairment. Those with severe functional impairment showed the strongest associations with comorbid diseases, for example, asthma and irritable bowel syndrome, perceived sensitivities to several environmental factors, like chemicals, and likelihood of having symptoms in multiple organs, while those with no or little functional impairment showed weak or even inverse associations. Similar results emerged with severity of indoor air–related symptoms. Conclusions: Individuals with indoor air–related symptoms are a very heterogeneous group. This should be better considered in future research and clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0000000000002884

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reactions to everyday environmental factors can range from mild discomfort to general, nonspecific symptoms across various organ systems, and disabling fear-avoidance, impacting daily life, work attendance, and productivity.

    “Reactions to everyday environmental factors can range from mild discomfort to general, nonspecific symptoms across various organ systems, such as headaches, fatigue, or respiratory issues, and disabling fear-avoidance, impacting daily life, work attendance, and productivity [2, 11, 13, 14].”

    From Work Ability and Functioning Among Individuals with Persistent Indoor Environment-Related Symptoms or Chronic Fatigue: Nine-Month Follow-Up of a Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Learning Outcomes describe symptoms ranging from irritation to fatigue and headaches, and the Discussion describes symptoms across multiple organ systems attributed to environmental factors. The Results link more severe indoor-air symptoms with avoidance, sick leave, and impaired work ability. The paper does not establish that avoidance is driven by fear or report a productivity measure, so those parts of the claim go beyond its findings. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [26]Gould R Ilmarinen J Järvisalo J Koskinen S. Dimensions of work ability. In: Results From the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2008: 25– 34.
  2. [45]Pekkanen J Jousilahti P Tiina L. Indoor air-associated symptoms (in Finnish). In: Koponen P Borodulin K Lundqvist A Sääksjärvi K Koskinen S,, eds. Health, Functional Capacity and Welfare in Finland – FinHealth 2017 study. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2018: 90– 91.
  3. [46]Borodulin K Sääksjärvi K, eds. FinHealth 2017 Study – Methods. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2019: 132.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eidstø, E., Selinheimo, S., Lampi, J., Salmela, A., & Pekkanen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2023-05-23
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
717-724
ISSN
  • 1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5948
OpenAlex
W4378348912
Cited by
7
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (338679)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
indoor air quality, functional disability, symptom severity, asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, environmental sensitivity, chemosensitivity, comorbid diseases
MeSH terms
Asthma, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review