CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Prognosis of Burnout and Prolonged Fatigue in the Working Population: A Comparison

Leone, Stephanie S., Huibers, Marcus J. H., Knottnerus, J André, Kant, IJmert·2008·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.1097/jom.0b013e31817e7c05
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To assess and compare prognostic factors for recovery in burnout and prolonged fatigue. Method Baseline, 12-, 24-, and 48-month follow-up data from the Maastricht Cohort Study were used. Prolonged fatigue or burnout cases or both at baseline (n = 2356) were divided into three subgroups: "pure fatigue," "pure burnout," and "burnout & fatigue". Using logistic generalized estimating equation analysis, baseline predictors of recovery, including (mental) health, work, and demographic factors, were determined. Results Selection variables predicted recovery across the subgroups. Health factors predicted recovery in the pure fatigue and burnout & fatigue subgroups. Differences in work factors emerged between the subgroups. Work factors especially predicted recovery in the pure burnout group. Conclusion Differences emerged with respect to work and health factors which suggest the importance of differentiating between burnout and prolonged fatigue. This could provide valuable leads for intervention possibilities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31817e7c05

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Kant, 2003, An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study., Occup Environ Med, 60, i32, 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32 · DOI
  2. Janssen, 2003, Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work., Occup Environ Med, 60, 71, 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i71 · DOI
  3. Borritz, 2006, Burnout as a predictor of self-reported sickness absence among human service workers: prospective findings from three year follow up of the PUMA study., Occup Environ Med, 63, 98, 10.1136/oem.2004.019364 · DOI
  4. Skapinakis, 2004, Temporal relations between unexplained fatigue and depression: longitudinal data from an international study in primary care., Psychosom Med, 66, 330, 10.1097/01.psy.0000124757.10167.b1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Schaufeli, 2003, Past performance and future perspectives of burnout research., S Afr J Ind Psychol, 29, 1
  6. Bultmann, 2002, Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates., J Psychosom Res, 52, 445, 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00228-8 · DOI
  7. Schaufeli, 2005, The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: common ground and worlds apart., Work Stress, 19, 256, 10.1080/02678370500385913 · DOI
  8. Leone, 2007, Similarities, overlap and differences between burnout and prolonged fatigue in the working population., QJM, 100, 617, 10.1093/qjmed/hcm073 · DOI
  9. Huibers, 2003, Fatigue, burnout, and chronic fatigue syndrome among employees on sick leave: do attributions make the difference?, Occup Environ Med, 60, 26, 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i26 · DOI
  10. Cairns, 2005, A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome., Occup Med, 55, 20, 10.1093/occmed/kqi013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Mommersteeg, 2006, A longitudinal study on cortisol and complaint reduction in burnout., Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 793, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.03.003 · DOI
  12. Sonnenschein, 2007, Sick With Burnout Clarified Through Electronic Diaries. PhD thesis.
  13. Vercoulen, 1999, De Checklist Individuele Spankracht (CIS) [The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS)]., Gedragstherapie, 32, 131
  14. Vercoulen, 1994, Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome., J Psychosom Res, 38, 383, 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90099-X · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bultmann, 2000, Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: determination of a cutoff point for the checklist individual strength., J Occup Health Psychol, 5, 411, 10.1037/1076-8998.5.4.411 · DOI
  16. Hardy, 1997, Fatigue in the workforce of National Health Service Trusts: levels of symptomatology and links with minor psychiatric disorder, demographic, occupational and work role factors., J Psychosom Res, 43, 83, 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00019-6 · DOI
  17. Aaronson, 1998, Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations., J Clin Epidemiol, 51, 1055, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ware, 1992, The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection., Med Care, 30, 473, 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hamilton, 2005, The prognosis of different fatigue diagnostic labels: a longitudinal survey., Fam Pract, 22, 383, 10.1093/fampra/cmi021 · DOI
  20. Huibers, 2006, The act of diagnosis: pros and cons of labelling chronic fatigue syndrome., Psychol Med, 36, 895, 10.1017/S0033291705006926 · DOI
  21. Michielsen, 2004, Determinants of general fatigue and emotional exhaustion: A prospective study., Psychol Health, 19, 223, 10.1080/08870440310001627135 · DOI
  22. Michielsen, 2004, Examination of the dimensionality of fatigue—the construction of the fatigue assessment scale (FAS)., Eur J Psychol Assess, 20, 39, 10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.39 · DOI
  23. De Vries, 2003, Assessment of fatigue among working people: a comparison of six questionnaires., Occup Environ Med, 60, 10, 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i10 · DOI
  24. Sonnenschein, 2007, Electronic diary evidence on energy erosion in clinical burnout., J Occup Health Psychol, 12, 402, 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.402 · DOI
  25. Janssen, 2004, The Natural Course of Fatigue in a Working Population., 10.26481/dis.20040617nj · DOI
  26. Huibers, 2004, Development of the chronic fatigue syndrome in severely fatigued employees: predictors of outcome in the Maastricht cohort study., J Epidemiol Community Health, 58, 877, 10.1136/jech.2003.017939 · DOI
  27. Huibers, 2004, Predicting the two-year course of unexplained fatigue and the onset of long-term sickness absence in fatigued employees: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study., J Occup Environ Med, 46, 1041, 10.1097/01.jom.0000137714.46149.17 · DOI
  28. Schmaling, 2003, Prospective study of the prognosis of unexplained chronic fatigue in a clinic-based cohort., Psychosom Med, 65, 1047, 10.1097/01.PSY.0000088587.29901.69 · DOI
  29. Chalder, 2003, Predictors of outcome in a fatigued population in primary care following a randomized controlled trial., Psychol Med, 33, 283, 10.1017/S0033291702007006 · DOI
  30. Afari, 2003, Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review., Am J Psychiatry, 160, 221, 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leone, S. S., Huibers, M. J. H., Knottnerus, J. A., & Kant, I.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2008-10
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1195-1202
ISSN
1076-2752
DOI
10.1097/jom.0b013e31817e7c05
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review