Cited by 32Smoking Behavior and CessationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational exposure and asthma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary function abnormalities in never smoking flight attendants exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke in the aircraft cabin

Open access
Arjomandi, Mehrdad, Haight, Thaddeus, Redberg, Rita, Gold, Warren M.·2009·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the flight attendants who were exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke in the aircraft cabin have abnormal pulmonary function. METHODS: We administered questionnaires and performed pulmonary function testing in 61 never-smoking female flight attendants who worked in active air crews before the smoking ban on commercial aircraft (preban). RESULTS: Although the preban flight attendants had normal FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC ratio, they had significantly decreased flow at mid- and low-lung volumes, curvilinear flow-volume curves, and evidence of air trapping. Furthermore, the flight attendants had significantly decreased diffusing capacity (77.5% +/- 11.2% predicted normal) with 51% having a diffusing capacity below their 95% normal prediction limit. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of healthy never-smoking flight attendants who were exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke in the aircraft cabin showed pulmonary function abnormalities suggestive of airway obstruction and impaired diffusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a7f048

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arjomandi, M., Haight, T., Redberg, R., & Gold, W. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gold, Warren M.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2009-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
639-646
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043151873
Cited by
32
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (L30 HL082326, K23HL083099)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
passive smoking, flight attendants, aircraft cabin, never-smoking women, lung function, airway obstruction, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, air trapping, flow-volume curve, occupational exposure, smoking bans
MeSH terms
Aged, Aircraft, Female, Forced Expiratory Flow Rates, Humans, Lung, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Respiratory Insufficiency, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review