Cited by 182Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

EGFR mutation testing practices within the Asia Pacific region: results of a multicenter diagnostic survey

Open access
Yatabe, Yasushi, Kerr, Keith M., Utomo, Ahmad, Rajadurai, Pathmanathan, Tran, Van Khanh, Du, Xiang, Chou, Teh-Ying, Enriquez, Ma. Luisa D. +17 more·2015·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients necessitates accurate, timely testing. Although EGFR mutation testing has been adopted by many laboratories in Asia, data are lacking on the proportion of NSCLC patients tested in each country, and the most commonly used testing methods. METHODS: A retrospective survey of records from NSCLC patients tested for EGFR mutations during 2011 was conducted in 11 Asian Pacific countries at 40 sites that routinely performed EGFR mutation testing during that period. Patient records were used to complete an online questionnaire at each site. RESULTS: Of the 22,193 NSCLC patient records surveyed, 31.8% (95% confidence interval: 31.2%-32.5%) were tested for EGFR mutations. The rate of EGFR mutation positivity was 39.6% among the 10,687 cases tested. The majority of samples were biopsy and/or cytology samples (71.4%). DNA sequencing was the most commonly used testing method accounting for 40% and 32.5% of tissue and cytology samples, respectively. A pathology report was available only to 60.0% of the sites, and 47.5% were not members of a Quality Assurance Scheme. CONCLUSIONS: In 2011, EGFR mutation testing practices varied widely across Asia. These data provide a reference platform from which to improve the molecular diagnosis of NSCLC, and EGFR mutation testing in particular, in Asia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jto.0000000000000422

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yatabe, Y., Kerr, K. M., Utomo, A., Rajadurai, P., Tran, V. K., Du, X., Chou, T.-Y., Enriquez, M. L. D., Lee, G. K., Iqbal, J., Shuangshoti, S., Chung, J.-H., Hagiwara, K., Liang, Z., Normanno, N., Park, K., Toyooka, S., Tsai, C.-M., Waring, P., Zhang, L., McCormack, R., Ratcliffe, M., Itoh, Y., Sugeno, M., & Mok, T.
Affiliations
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • St. Luke's Medical Center (PH)
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • Saitama Medical University (JP)
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Okayama University (JP)
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (Japan) (JP)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yatabe, Yasushi
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
438-445
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077848542
Cited by
182
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25293090)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
EGFR mutation testing, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Asia-Pacific region, diagnostic practices, DNA sequencing, pathology reports, quality assurance, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Asia, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Pacific Islands, Prognosis, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Retrospective Studies, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Databases, Factual, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review