Cited by 4,081Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study

Zhou, Caicun, Wu, Yi-Long, Chen, Gongyan, Feng, Jifeng, Liu, Xiao-Qing, Wang, Changli, Zhang, Shucai, Wang, Jie +16 more·2011·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background Activating mutations in EGFR are important markers of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The OPTIMAL study compared efficacy and tolerability of the TKI erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.Methods We undertook an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at 22 centres in China. Patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a confirmed activating mutation of EGFR (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R point mutation) received either oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects, or up to four cycles of gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimisation procedure and were stratified according to EGFR mutation type, histological subtype (adenocarcinoma vs non-adenocarcinoma), and smoking status. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, analysed in patients with confirmed disease who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00874419, and has completed enrolment; patients are still in follow-up.Findings 83 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 82 to receive gemcitabine plus carboplatin; 82 in the erlotinib group and 72 in the chemotherapy group were included in analysis of the primary endpoint. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in erlotinib-treated patients than in those on chemotherapy (13.1 [95% CI 10.58-16.53] vs 4.6 [4.21-5.42] months; hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.10-0.26; p<0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with more grade 3 or 4 toxic effects than was erlotinib (including neutropenia in 30 [42%] of 72 patients and thrombocytopenia in 29 [40%] patients on chemotherapy vs no patients with either event on erlotinib); the most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effects with erlotinib were increased alanine aminotransferase concentrations (three [4%] of 83 patients) and skin rash (two [2%] patients). Chemotherapy was also associated with increased treatment-related serious adverse events (ten [14%] of 72 patients [decreased platelet count, n=8; decreased neutrophil count, n=1; hepatic dysfunction, n=1] vs two [2%] of 83 patients [both hepatic dysfunction]).Interpretation Compared with standard chemotherapy, erlotinib conferred a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and was associated with more favourable tolerability. These findings suggest that erlotinib is important for first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (China); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70184-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First-generation EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib have shown improved efficacy and tolerability compared with chemotherapy in phase III trials.

    “have shown improved efficacy and tolerability compared with chemotherapy in numerous phase III trials”
  • Eight randomised controlled phase III trials have demonstrated that first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs represent the best first-line treatment option in patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumours harbour EGFR mutations, when compared with chemotherapy, because they significantly improved the RR and PFS.

    “Eight randomised controlled phase III trials (table 1) have demonstrated that first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs represent the best first-line treatment option in patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumours harbour EGFR mutations, when compared with chemotherapy, because they significantly improved the RR and progression-free survival (PFS).4–11”
  • Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC usually respond to first-generation TKIs but most progress after about 9-14 months.

    “Unfortunately, whilst patients with EGFRm+ tumors typically show good initial responses to first generation TKIs, most patients who respond to therapy ultimately develop disease progression after about 9-14 months of treatment (7-11).”
  • In first-line targeted therapy trials for oncogene-addicted NSCLC, objective response rates typically range from 50% to 83%, complete responses are rare, and some patients show de novo resistance.

    “Across clinical trials of first-line targeted therapy for oncogene-addicted subgroups of NSCLC, rates of objective response [G] typically range between 50% and 83% and complete responses [G] are rare; in addition, some patients exhibit de novo resistance16–26, 28–32, 35.”
  • Duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival are even more variable across these trials.

    “Even more variable are duration of response to targeted therapy, progression-free survival and overall survival16–26, 28–32, 35.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C., Wu, Y.-L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., Lu, S., Zhang, L., Hu, C., Hu, C., Luo, Y., Chen, L., Ye, M., Huang, J., Zhi, X., Zhang, Y., Xiu, Q., Ma, J., Zhang, L., & You, C.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Guangdong General Hospital (CN)
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Caicun
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
735-742
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160982674
Cited by
4,081
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 238 · 2021: 301 · 2020: 272 · 2019: 310 · 2018: 360 · 2017: 383 · 2016: 364 · 2015: 412 · 2014: 351 · 2013: 325 · 2012: 218
FWCI
250.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
erlotinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line therapy, progression-free survival, exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation, chemotherapy toxicity, OPTIMAL trial, Chinese patients, adenocarcinoma
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gemcitabine, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, China, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Carboplatin, Gene Deletion, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review