Cited by 274Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline Part I

Schlegel, Peter N., Sigman, Mark, Collura, Barbara, De Jonge, Christopher J., Eisenberg, Michael L., Lamb, Dolores J., Mulhall, John P., Niederberger, Craig +7 more·2021·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part I outlines the appropriate evaluation of the male in an infertile couple. Recommendations proceed from obtaining an appropriate history and physical exam (Appendix I), as well as diagnostic testing, where indicated. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January, 2000 through May, 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation of male infertility as well as the association of male infertility with other important health conditions. The detection of male infertility increases the risk of subsequent development of health problems for men. In addition, specific medical conditions are associated with some causes for male infertility. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: The presence of male infertility is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ju.0000000000001521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlegel, P. N., Sigman, M., Collura, B., De Jonge, C. J., Eisenberg, M. L., Lamb, D. J., Mulhall, J. P., Niederberger, C., Sandlow, J. I., Sokol, R. Z., Spandorfer, S. D., Tanrikut, C., Treadwell, J. R., Oristaglio, J. T., & Zini, A.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • ReSoLVE Center of Excellence (FI)
  • University of Minnesota School of Medicine
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • ECRI Institute (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2021-01
Volume
205
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W4254230981
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 21
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
male infertility, infertility evaluation, infertility diagnosis, infertility treatment, clinical guidelines, diagnostic testing, history and physical examination
MeSH terms
Counseling, Humans, Infertility, Male, Life Style, Male, Scrotum, Societies, Medical, Ultrasonography, United States, Urology, Reproductive Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review