Cited by 31Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersVestibular and auditory disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Autonomic nervous system function in chronic dizziness

Staab, Jeffrey P., Ruckenstein, Michael J.·2007·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to validate the clinical diagnosis of autonomic dizziness as a cause of chronic nonvertiginous dizziness that may be exacerbated by physical exertion or orthostatic challenges, estimate its prevalence in a tertiary referral population, and investigate the usefulness of three autonomic challenges as objective tests for this condition. STUDY DESIGN: Laboratory investigation of autonomic activity. SETTING: Tertiary care balance center. PATIENTS: Fifteen men and women with symptoms indicative of autonomic dizziness. Subjects with other causes of dizziness, histories of syncope, or psychiatric disorders were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Autonomic tests included 45 minutes of head upright tilt (HUT), 20 minutes of 5% CO2 inhalation and then HUT, and 2 minutes of voluntary hyperventilation and then HUT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patterns of cardiovascular and respiratory responses and subjective ratings of dizziness, autonomic symptoms, and anxiety during autonomic challenges. RESULTS: Twelve subjects had evidence of autonomic dysfunction, including 10 with abnormal heart rate, blood pressure, or respiratory responses to HUT. Two other subjects had prolonged hypocarbia after voluntary hyperventilation. Many of these abnormalities would have been missed by current autonomic testing paradigms. In one subject, CO2 inhalation revealed latent anxiety. In two subjects, the presence of high symptom ratings without objective autonomic dysfunction prompted a successful search for other diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Study results validated the clinical syndrome of autonomic dizziness. Autonomic testing protocols may have to be updated to detect clinically relevant abnormalities in patients with dizziness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0b013e31805c74a7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staab, J. P., & Ruckenstein, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Staab, Jeffrey P.
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2007-09
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
854-859
ISSN
1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044656108
Cited by
31
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
autonomic dysfunction, voluntary hyperventilation, hypocapnia, cardiovascular response, respiratory response, anxiety, prevalence, autonomic function testing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Blood Pressure, Carbon Dioxide, Chronic Disease, Dizziness, Postural Balance, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hyperventilation, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Sickness, Posture, Shy-Drager Syndrome, Respiratory Mechanics, Supine Position, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review