Cited by 217Vestibular and auditory disordersCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersMigraine and Headache Studies

Expanding the Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Dizziness

Staab, Jeffrey P., Ruckenstein, Michael J.·2007·Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic dizziness by identifying clinical conditions associated with persistent symptoms and delineating key diagnostic features that differentiate its causes and direct attention to specific treatments. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from 1998 to 2004. SETTING: Tertiary care balance center. PATIENTS: A total of 345 men and women, aged 15 to 89 years, referred for evaluation of chronic dizziness (duration of > or =3 months) of uncertain cause. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were systematically directed through multiple specialty examinations until definitive diagnoses were made. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Final diagnoses associated with dizziness. RESULTS: Nearly all patients with chronic subjective dizziness were diagnosed with psychiatric or neurologic illnesses. These included primary and secondary anxiety disorders (n = 206 [59.7%]) and central nervous system conditions (n = 133 [38.6%]), specifically migraine headaches, mild traumatic brain injuries, and neurally mediated dysautonomias. A small number of patients (6 [1.7%]) had dysrhythmias. Four of 5 patients with migraine or dysrhythmias had comorbid anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dizziness has several common causes, including anxiety disorders, migraine, traumatic brain injuries, and dysautonomia, that require different treatments. Key features of the clinical history distinguish these illnesses from one another and from active neurotologic conditions. The high prevalence of secondary anxiety may give a false impression of psychogenicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archotol.133.2.170

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staab, J. P., & Ruckenstein, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
133
Issue
2
Pages
170
ISSN
0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099190753
Cited by
217
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
Keywords
chronic dizziness, differential diagnosis, anxiety disorders, migraine, mild traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrhythmias, comorbidities, psychogenic dizziness, central nervous system disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Disease, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Techniques, Otological, Dizziness, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Post-Concussion Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review