Cited by 22Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsBlood properties and coagulation

Discard tubes are not necessary when drawing samples for specialized coagulation testing

Smock, Kristi J, Crist, Ronda A, Hansen, Sarah J, Rodgers, George M, Lehman, Christopher M·2010·Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis

Abstract

Discard tubes have traditionally been obtained when drawing samples for coagulation testing to avoid potential tissue factor activation of coagulation in the first tube that may lead to inaccurate results. Although discard tubes are no longer required for prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time, the practice is still recommended for other coagulation studies due to lack of sufficient evidence that discard tubes are not needed. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the first citrate tube drawn can be used for special coagulation testing. We performed testing for fibrinogen, D-dimer, factors VIII, IX, XI, proteins C and S, and antithrombin on 30 healthy individuals and factors II, VII, IX, X, and proteins C and S on a second group of 30 healthy individuals and 30 individuals receiving warfarin. Testing was performed on two consecutive samples to evaluate the level of agreement between the two tubes. Paired t-testing showed no statistically significant differences between tube 1 and tube 2 for any of the tests performed. Most data pairs (tube 1, tube 2) agreed within 10% difference or less, and no positive or negative biases were observed. To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the need for discard tubes in a variety of coagulation tests using both normal and abnormal samples. Our data suggest that discard tubes are not necessary when drawing samples for specialized coagulation testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mbc.0b013e3283380d12

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a coagulation tube is collected as the first or the only tube and a straight needle is used for blood collection, no discard tube is needed.

    “and a straight needle is used for blood collection, no discard tube is needed [75], [76]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smock, K. J., Crist, R. A., Hansen, S. J., Rodgers, G. M., & Lehman, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (US)
Corresponding author
Smock, Kristi J
Venue
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
279-282
ISSN
0957-5235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002890223
Cited by
22
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Blood properties and coagulation
Keywords
coagulation tests, tissue factor activation, fibrinogen, D-dimer, coagulation factors, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, warfarin
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Blood Coagulation Tests, Blood Specimen Collection, Humans, Warfarin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review