CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of physical training status on postexercise hypotension in patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study

Imazu, Alexandre A., Goessler, Karla F., Casonatto, Juliano, Polito, Marcos D.·2017·Blood Pressure Monitoring
DOI 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000255
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have analyzed postexercise hypotension (PEH) in hypertensive patients with different levels of physical fitness. AIM: Therefore, this study aimed to compare PEH in trained and sedentary hypertensive individuals. METHODS: Fifty-one well-controlled hypertensive patients of both sexes were assigned to a trained group [60.4±9.4 years; resting blood pressure (BP)=126.3±5.4/75.0±6.3 mmHg; VO2peak=27.3±4.6 ml kg/min] and 58 sedentary hypertensive patients of both sexes were assigned to a sedentary group (63.1±8.9 years; resting BP=134.1±4.2/82.9±5.8 mmHg; VO2peak=20.6±5.5 ml/kg/min). In a cross-sectional design, the individuals were randomized to perform an aerobic exercise session (treadmill; 40 min; 55% VO2peak) and a control session on two different days in the morning. After each session, participants wore an ambulatory BP device for 12 h. RESULTS: Although no significant differences were identified in BP after the control session, after the experimental session, the trained participants presented lower values than the sedentary participants for systolic (124.1±6.3 vs. 133.4±5.2 mmHg, P<0.01) and diastolic BP (73.1±4.4 vs. 85.5±6.4 mmHg, P<0.01) over the course of 12 h monitoring. For the trained participants, significant correlations were also identified (P<0.05) between the VO2peak and systolic (R=-0.68) and diastolic BP (R=-0.61) 12 h monitoring. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the training level of hypertensive patients influences PEH.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000255

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Imazu, A. A., Goessler, K. F., Casonatto, J., & Polito, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universidade Norte do Paraná (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Imazu, Alexandre A.
  • Goessler, Karla F.
ORCID
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2017-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
196-201
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/mbp.0000000000000255
OpenAlex
W2733465255
Cited by
15
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
post-exercise hypotension, hypertension, physical fitness, aerobic exercise, sedentary lifestyle, peak oxygen uptake, ambulatory blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Hypotension, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review