Optimum waveform envelopes and amplitude ratios in oscillometric blood pressure estimation
Abstract
Objective: To determine if, when using the oscillometric method, there is a specific range of amplitude ratios in the fixed-ratio algorithm that will result in blood pressure estimates that consistently fall within a mean error ≤5 mmHg and a SD of the error <8 mmHg. Additionally, to apply different representations of the oscillometric waveform envelope to verify if this will affect the accuracy of the results. Methods: SBP and DBP were obtained using the fixed-ratios method applied to a dataset of 219 oscillometric measurements obtained from 73 healthy volunteers and compared to their corresponding auscultation values. Ratio and envelope analysis were done on Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Results: Depending on the envelope representation, ratios between 0.44–0.74 for systolic pressure and 0.51–0.85 for diastolic pressure yield results within the limits mentioned above. When a set of optimum envelope representations and ratios are selected based on population mean, the highest percentage of subjects presenting blood pressure estimates within the limits were 72.6% for systolic and 69.9% for diastolic. Conclusion: The range of ratios presenting optimum results appears to be independent of the degree of arterial stiffness given the wide range of ages of the subjects in the study. Different representations of the oscillometric waveform envelope may improve the accuracy of the method. However, there remains a considerable percentage of the population with unreliable results. It is therefore important to only use devices that have been properly validated according to standard protocol.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different methods to construct the oscillometric waveform envelope and individual differences in envelope shape can lead to different estimated BP values.
“Furthermore, different methods used to construct the oscillometric waveform envelope, as well as individual differences in the shape of the waveform envelope, can lead to different estimated BP values [55, 56].”
From Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Rapsomaniki, E., Timmis, A., George, J., Pujades-Rodriguez, M., Shah, A. D., Denaxas, S., White, I. R., Caulfield, M. J., Deanfield, J. E., Smeeth, L., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60685-1 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Characterization of the oscillometric method for measuring indirect blood pressure
Geddes, L. A., Voelz, M., Combs, C., Reiner, D., & Babbs, C. F. (1982) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02367308 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
van Popele, N. M., Bos, W. J. W., de Beer, N. A. M., van der Kuip, D. A. M., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D. E., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2000) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.36.4.484 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Stergiou, G. S., Lourida, P., Tzamouranis, D., & Baibas, N. M. (2009) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/jhh.2009.20 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated 'oscillometric' blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure
Sharman, J. E., Tan, I., Stergiou, G. S., Lombardi, C., Saladini, F., Butlin, M., Padwal, R., Asayama, K., Avolio, A., Brady, T. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/s41371-022-00693-x · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationG. Celler, B., Butlin, M., Argha, A., Tan, I., Yong, A., & Avolio, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3079578 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Measurements of arterial pressure and flow in vivo
Sharman, J. E., Segers, P., & Chirinos, J. A. (2022) · Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91391-1.00002-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alvarado Alvarez, M., Padwal, R., Ringrose, J., Jalali, A., & Hiebert, W.
- Affiliations
- Medicine, University of Alberta
- National Research Council Canada (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Venue
- Blood Pressure Monitoring
- Published
- 2020-09-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-59
- ISSN
- 1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3083014084
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NPARC (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- oscillometric blood pressure measurement, waveform envelope, amplitude ratio, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, measurement accuracy, arterial stiffness, device validation
- MeSH terms
- Auscultation, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Oscillometry, Blood Pressure Monitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review