Cited by 12Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Optimum waveform envelopes and amplitude ratios in oscillometric blood pressure estimation

Alvarado Alvarez, Mariana, Padwal, Raj, Ringrose, Jennifer, Jalali, Afrooz, Hiebert, Wayne·2021·Blood Pressure Monitoring

Abstract

Objective: To determine if, when using the oscillometric method, there is a specific range of amplitude ratios in the fixed-ratio algorithm that will result in blood pressure estimates that consistently fall within a mean error ≤5 mmHg and a SD of the error <8 mmHg. Additionally, to apply different representations of the oscillometric waveform envelope to verify if this will affect the accuracy of the results. Methods: SBP and DBP were obtained using the fixed-ratios method applied to a dataset of 219 oscillometric measurements obtained from 73 healthy volunteers and compared to their corresponding auscultation values. Ratio and envelope analysis were done on Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Results: Depending on the envelope representation, ratios between 0.44–0.74 for systolic pressure and 0.51–0.85 for diastolic pressure yield results within the limits mentioned above. When a set of optimum envelope representations and ratios are selected based on population mean, the highest percentage of subjects presenting blood pressure estimates within the limits were 72.6% for systolic and 69.9% for diastolic. Conclusion: The range of ratios presenting optimum results appears to be independent of the degree of arterial stiffness given the wide range of ages of the subjects in the study. Different representations of the oscillometric waveform envelope may improve the accuracy of the method. However, there remains a considerable percentage of the population with unreliable results. It is therefore important to only use devices that have been properly validated according to standard protocol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000485

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different methods to construct the oscillometric waveform envelope and individual differences in envelope shape can lead to different estimated BP values.

    “Furthermore, different methods used to construct the oscillometric waveform envelope, as well as individual differences in the shape of the waveform envelope, can lead to different estimated BP values [55, 56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alvarado Alvarez, M., Padwal, R., Ringrose, J., Jalali, A., & Hiebert, W.
Affiliations
  • Medicine, University of Alberta
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
53-59
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083014084
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
oscillometric blood pressure measurement, waveform envelope, amplitude ratio, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, measurement accuracy, arterial stiffness, device validation
MeSH terms
Auscultation, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Oscillometry, Blood Pressure Monitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review