The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Poor communication in critical care teams has been frequently shown as a contributing factor to adverse events. There is now a strong emphasis on identifying the communication skills that can contribute to, or protect against, preventable medical errors. This review considers communication research recently conducted in the intensive care unit and other acute domains. RECENT FINDINGS: Error studies in the intensive care unit have shown good communication to be crucial for ensuring patient safety. Interventions to improve communication in the intensive care unit have resulted in reduced reports of adverse events, and simulated emergency scenarios have shown effective communication to be correlated with improved technical performance. In other medical domains where communication is crucial for safety, the relationship between communication skills and error has been examined more closely, with highly detailed teamwork assessment tools being developed. SUMMARY: Critical care teams perform many activities where effective communication is crucial for ensuring patient safety and reducing susceptibility to error. To develop valid team training and assessment tools for improving teamwork in the intensive care unit there is a requirement to better understand and identify the specific communication skills important for safety during the provision of intensive care medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Training and simulation for patient safety
Aggarwal, R., Mytton, O. T., Derbrew, M., Hananel, D., Heydenburg, M., Issenberg, B., MacAulay, C., Mancini, M. E., Morimoto, T., Soper, N., et al. (2010) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.038562 · Cited by 739
Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare
Weller, J., Boyd, M., & Cumin, D. (2014) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131168 · Cited by 698
Developing a team performance framework for the intensive care unit*
Reader, T. W., Flin, R., Mearns, K., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2009) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819f0451 · Cited by 295
Self-citationHains, I. M., Georgiou, A., & Westbrook, J. I. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000422 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Reader, T. W., Flin, R., & Cuthbertson, B. H.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Critical Care
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 732-736
- ISSN
- 1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024151720
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mcc.0b013e3282f1bb0e
- The paper
- Reader, T. W., Flin, R., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2007). Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0b013e3282f1bb0e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.