Cited by 46Microbial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Evaluation of Prebiotic Potential of Refined Psyllium (Plantago ovata) Fiber in Healthy Women

Elli, Marina, Cattivelli, Daniela, Soldi, Sara, Bonatti, Marzia, Morelli, Lorenzo·2008·Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Abstract

GOAL: To assess the effects of the consumption of psyllium seed husk on fecal bifidobacteria in healthy women and the ability of fecal bifidobacteria to metabolize psyllium seed husk in vitro. BACKGROUND: Poor microbiologic evidences are nowadays available concerning the ability of psyllium seed husk to promote the growth of bifidobacteria in human gut. STUDY: Eleven healthy women consumed 7.0 g/d of psyllium seed husk for 1 month. Viability of bifidobacteria in feces was assessed at different time points. RESULTS: In vivo results showed that the average fecal content of viable bifidobacteria was not significantly affected even if fecal counts were found to increase significantly after treatment in 6 out of 11 women having low initial concentration. In vitro trials conducted on bifidobacteria strains isolated from treated women failed to confirm the prebiotic potential of undigested psyllium seed husk, whereas treatment with simulated gastric and pancreatic juices and mimicking physical and chemical alterations during human gut transit allowed fecal Bifidobacterium isolates to metabolize psyllium seed husk as carbon source in a growth medium deprived of sugar. CONCLUSIONS: Psyllium seed husk can be metabolized by bifidobacteria only after partial hydrolysis. Bifidogenic potential can be detected in healthy women only in case of low level of fecal bifidobacteria before treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcg.0b013e31817f183a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dextrin is a polysaccharide similar to fructan and can stimulate the growth of probiotic strains such as Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes and reduce pathogenic bacteria.

    “Dextrin was used as positive control because dextrin is a polysaccharide [25], similar to fructan, and can stimulate the growth of probiotic strains such as Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes [26], and reduced numbers of pathogenic bacteria [27].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elli, M., Cattivelli, D., Soldi, S., Bonatti, M., & Morelli, L.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2008-09
Volume
42
Issue
Supplement 3
Pages
S174-S176
ISSN
0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076783348
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
prebiotic activity, Bifidobacterium, gut microbiota, dietary fiber, in vitro digestion, healthy women
MeSH terms
Adult, Bifidobacterium, Dietary Fiber, Feces, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psyllium, Seeds, Time Factors, Colony Count, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review