Cited by 113Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInfant Health and Development

Psyllium fiber reduces abdominal pain in children with irritable bowel syndrome in a randomized, double-blind trial

Open access
Shulman, Robert J., Hollister, Emily B., Cain, Kevin, Czyzewski, Danita I., Self, Mariella M., Weidler, Erica M., Devaraj, Sridevi, Luna, Ruth Ann +2 more·2017·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims We sought to determine the efficacy of psyllium fiber treatment on abdominal pain and stool patterns in children with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated effects on breath hydrogen and methane production, gut permeability, and microbiome composition. We also investigated whether psychological characteristics of children or parents affected the response to treatment.Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind trial of 103 children (mean age, 13 ± 3 y) with IBS seen at primary or tertiary care settings. After 2 weeks on their habitual diet, children began an 8-day diet excluding carbohydrates thought to cause symptoms of IBS. Children with ≥75% improvement in abdominal pain were excluded (n = 17). Children were assigned randomly to groups given psyllium (n = 37) or placebo (maltodextrin, n = 47) for 6 weeks. Two-week pain and stool diaries were compared at baseline and during the final 2 weeks of treatment. We assessed breath hydrogen and methane production, intestinal permeability, and the composition of the microbiome before and after administration of psyllium or placebo. Psychological characteristics of children were measured at baseline.Results Children in the psyllium group had a greater reduction in the mean number of pain episodes than children in the placebo group (mean reduction of 8.2 ± 1.2 after receiving psyllium vs mean reduction of 4.1 ± 1.3 after receiving placebo; P = .03); the level of pain intensity did not differ between the groups. Psychological characteristics were not associated with response. At the end of the study period, the percentage of stools that were normal (Bristol scale scores, 3-5), breath hydrogen or methane production, intestinal permeability, and microbiome composition were similar between groups.Conclusions Psyllium fiber reduced the number of abdominal pain episodes in children with IBS, independent of psychological factors. Psyllium did not alter breath hydrogen or methane production, gut permeability, or microbiome composition. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00526903.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.045

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psyllium fiber reduced pain episodes in an RCT enrolling children with IBS without altering gut microbiota composition based on 16S rRNA analysis.

    “On the other hand, psyllium fiber reduced pain episodes in an RCT enrolling children with IBS without altering the composition of the gut microbiota based on 16S ribosomal RNA analysis136.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shulman, R. J., Hollister, E. B., Cain, K., Czyzewski, D. I., Self, M. M., Weidler, E. M., Devaraj, S., Luna, R. A., Versalovic, J., & Heitkemper, M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Shulman, Robert J.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
712-719.e4
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329980267
Cited by
113
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR005337)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056338)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
psyllium fiber, irritable bowel syndrome, pediatric IBS, abdominal pain, dietary fiber, intestinal permeability, gut microbiota, psychological factors, carbohydrate-free diet
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Breath Tests, Child, Dietary Fiber, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Placebos, Psyllium, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Outcome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review