Cited by 58Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of rational emotive behavior coaching on occupational stress and work ability among electronics workshop instructors in Nigeria

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effectiveness of rational emotive behavior coaching (REBC) on occupational stress and work ability in a sample of electronics workshop instructors in Nigeria. METHODS: A pretest-posttest control group design was used. The participants were 108 electronics workshop instructors in technical colleges in the south-east of Nigeria who met the study inclusion criteria. Data were collected using 3 questionnaires and analyzed using a repeated measure analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: REBC led to a significant reduction in occupational stress experienced by the electronics workshop instructors in the REBC group compared to their counterparts in the waitlist control group. Furthermore, the scores for occupation-related irrational beliefs of the instructors in the REBC group were significantly lower than those in the waitlist control group at the end of the coaching intervention. The work ability of the REBC group was significantly better than that of the waitlist control group. Finally, the effects in the REBC group were significantly sustained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: REBC is a time-efficient and solution-focused therapeutic modality for assisting occupationally stressed employees in a Nigerian setting. REBC can be used for improving and maintaining work ability of workers. The researchers hope that occupational health professionals and health counselors would extend this approach to tackle psychological issues limiting employees' effectiveness and performance in the Nigerian work environment and in other countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000006891

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have found that REBT is effective in improving conditions associated with negative thoughts such as job stress, burnout, and irrational beliefs.

    “Previous studies have also found that the rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT) is effective in improving conditions associated with negative thoughts such as job stress, burnout, and irrational beliefs[9,10,13].”

    From Clinical benefits of rational-emotive stress management therapy for job burnout and dysfunctional distress of special education teachers (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion and Conclusion report that rational emotive behavior coaching (REBC), an approach adapted from REBT, reduced occupational stress and occupation-related irrational beliefs among electronics workshop instructors in Nigeria. The paper does not report an improvement in burnout, so it supports only part of the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • REBT is meant to assist clients to argue irrational beliefs and achieve adaptive and/or efficient beliefs associated with healthy living.

    “Hence, rational-emotive behavioral treatment is meant to therapeutically assist clients to argue irrational beliefs and achieve adaptive and/or efficient beliefs which are associated with healthy living[9,10,12-15,21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ogbuanya, T. C., Eseadi, C., Orji, C. T., Ohanu, I. B., Bakare, J., & Ede, M. O.
Affiliations
University of Nigeria (NG)
Corresponding author
Eseadi, Chiedu
Venue
Medicine
Published
2017-05
Volume
96
Issue
19
Pages
e6891
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612977201
Cited by
58
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
occupational stress, work ability, irrational beliefs, occupational health, psychological intervention, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Work Performance, Mentoring, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Educational Status, Electronics, Emotions, Employment, Faculty, Female, Humans, Male, Nigeria, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Universities, Treatment Outcome, Marital Status, Controlled Before-After Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review