Cited by 130Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapamycin treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Protocol for a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial (RAP-ALS trial)

Open access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Misfolded aggregated proteins and neuroinflammation significantly contribute to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathogenesis, hence representing therapeutic targets to modify disease expression. Rapamycin inhibits mechanistic target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and enhances autophagy with demonstrated beneficial effects in neurodegeneration in cell line and animal models, improving phenotype in SQSTM1 zebrafish, in Drosophila model of ALS-TDP, and in the TDP43 mouse model, in which it reduced neuronal loss and TDP43 inclusions. Rapamycin also expands regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg) and increased Treg levels are associated with slow progression in ALS patients.Therefore, we planned a randomized clinical trial testing Rapamycin treatment in ALS patients. METHODS: RAP-ALS is a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (8 ALS centers in Italy), clinical trial. The primary aim is to assess whether Rapamycin administration increases Tregs number in treated patients compared with control arm. Secondary aims include the assessment of safety and tolerability of Rapamycin in patients with ALS; the minimum dosage to have Rapamycin in cerebrospinal fluid; changes in immunological (activation and homing of T, B, NK cell subpopulations) and inflammatory markers, and on mTOR downstream pathway (S6RP phosphorylation); clinical activity (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, survival, forced vital capacity); and quality of life (ALSAQ40 scale). DISCUSSION: Rapamycin potentially targets mechanisms at play in ALS (i.e., autophagy and neuroinflammation), with promising preclinical studies. It is an already approved drug, with known pharmacokinetics, already available and therefore with significant possibility of rapid translation to daily clinics. Findings will provide reliable data for further potential trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria of Modena and by the Ethics Committees of participating centers (Eudract n. 2016-002399-28) based on the Helsinki declaration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000011119

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 design of the study RAP-ALS.
Figure 1 design of the study RAP-ALS.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Metadata

Authors
Mandrioli, J., D’Amico, R., Zucchi, E., Gessani, A., Fini, N., Fasano, A., Caponnetto, C., Chiò, A., Dalla Bella, E., Lunetta, C., Mazzini, L., Marinou, K., Sorarù, G., de Biasi, S., Lo Tartaro, D., Pinti, M., & Cossarizza, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita (IT)
Corresponding author
Mandrioli, Jessica
Venue
Medicine
Published
2018-06
Volume
97
Issue
24
Pages
e11119
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807994366
Cited by
128
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila
  • Università degli Studi di Padova
  • Università degli Studi di Torino
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, rapamycin, mTOR signaling, autophagy, neuroinflammation, regulatory T cells, TDP-43, S6 phosphorylation, cerebrospinal fluid drug concentration, immunological markers, neurodegeneration, drug repurposing, ALS Functional Rating Scale, survival, forced vital capacity, quality of life
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Italy, Quality of Life, Research Design, Biomarkers, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Sirolimus, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review