Cited by 3,500Autophagy in Disease and TherapyGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice

Komatsu, Masaaki, Waguri, Satoshi, Chiba, Tomoki, Murata, Shigeo, Iwata, Jun-ichi, Tanida, Isei, Ueno, Takashi, Koike, Masato +3 more·2006·Nature

Abstract

Protein quality-control, especially the removal of proteins with aberrant structures, has an important role in maintaining the homeostasis of non-dividing neural cells. In addition to the ubiquitin-proteasome system, emerging evidence points to the importance of autophagy--the bulk protein degradation pathway involved in starvation-induced and constitutive protein turnover--in the protein quality-control process. However, little is known about the precise roles of autophagy in neurons. Here we report that loss of Atg7 (autophagy-related 7), a gene essential for autophagy, leads to neurodegeneration. We found that mice lacking Atg7 specifically in the central nervous system showed behavioural defects, including abnormal limb-clasping reflexes and a reduction in coordinated movement, and died within 28 weeks of birth. Atg7 deficiency caused massive neuronal loss in the cerebral and cerebellar cortices. Notably, polyubiquitinated proteins accumulated in autophagy-deficient neurons as inclusion bodies, which increased in size and number with ageing. There was, however, no obvious alteration in proteasome function. Our results indicate that autophagy is essential for the survival of neural cells, and that impairment of autophagy is implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders involving ubiquitin-containing inclusion bodies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04723

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komatsu, M., Waguri, S., Chiba, T., Murata, S., Iwata, J.-I., Tanida, I., Ueno, T., Koike, M., Uchiyama, Y., Kominami, E., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (JP)
  • Fukushima Medical University (JP)
  • Juntendo University (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, Keiji
Venue
Nature
Published
2006-04-19
Volume
441
Issue
7095
Pages
880-884
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2022812113
Cited by
3,500
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 216 · 2018: 191 · 2017: 206 · 2016: 196 · 2015: 191 · 2014: 191 · 2013: 210 · 2012: 201
FWCI
123.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
autophagy, neurodegeneration, ATG7, protein quality control, polyubiquitinated proteins, neuronal survival, central nervous system, neurodegenerative diseases, proteasome, brain aging, cerebellar cortex, cerebral cortex
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Protein 7, Animals, Autophagy, Inclusion Bodies, Central Nervous System, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Survival Rate, Cell Death, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Mice, Nestin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review