Cited by 1Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The effect of web-based double-eye control program on the prevention of pediatric medication errors of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study

Open access
Özgüven Öztornaci, Beste, Karakul, Atiye, Ardahan Akgül, Esra, Doğan, Pinar, Yildirim Sari, Hatice, Başbakkal, Zümrüt·2025·Medicine

Abstract

Background: Medication errors in the pediatric population are a major patient safety problem, leading to death, disability, or prolonged hospitalization. This study investigated the effect of medication skills training provided to senior pediatric nursing students through simulation and a web-based Double-Eye Control Program (DECP) on students’ pediatric medication error rates. Methods: This quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest study was conducted using structured, non-participant observation. The outcomes were overall medication error rate and subcategories (preparation, administration, follow-up, and recording). In the pre-intervention stage, students administered medication to a pediatric mannequin according to a scenario. The intervention consisted of simulation training supported by a web-based DECP. No randomization was performed. Post-intervention, students repeated the same scenario using the DECP. Data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, and interrater reliability among 4 observers was assessed using Fleiss’ Kappa. Results: The mean overall error rate decreased from 55.37% before the intervention to 13.52% after the intervention. Preparation, administration, follow-up, and recording error rates all significantly decreased ( P < .001). Conclusion: The web-based DECP integrated with simulation significantly reduced pediatric medication administration errors among student nurses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000046222

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers.

    “PMSC encompasses competencies including accurate medication calculation, safe administration practices, clinical decision-making, and effective communication with caregivers [1,4,5].”

    From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Methods (§2.4) describe students calculating doses, checking patient-specific medication guidance, and using the program to prevent administration errors; the Discussion (§4) also stresses calculation skills. These passages support calculation, safe administration, and aspects of clinical decision-making, but the paper does not describe PMSC as a defined set of competencies or address communication with caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical placements in pediatric wards are limited, so students may have fewer opportunities to gain sufficient experience administering medications to pediatric patients.

    “As clinical placements in pediatric wards are limited, students may have fewer opportunities to gain sufficient experience in administering medications to pediatric patients [4].”

    From Development and pilot evaluation of an AI-based pediatric medication safety virtual simulation program for nursing students: a quasi-experimental study in South Korea (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    Materials and Methods (§2.3; page not provided) says nursing students have limited clinical experience with pediatric medication administration and describes 96 hours of pediatric clinical practice. The Introduction also says patient-safety concerns make such experience difficult to obtain, but the paper does not say that limited pediatric ward placements are the reason. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Limited opportunities for active participation may make it difficult for nursing students to translate theoretical learning into practical competence.

    “In addition, limited opportunities for active participation may make it difficult for students to translate theoretical learning into practical competence [4,5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [15]15. Sarialioğlu A Köse S. Determining clinical comfort, worry and status of liking children among pediatric nursing students: case of two different universities. Acibadem Üniversitesi Sağlik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 13: 640- 6.
  2. [24]24. Özgüven Öztornaci B. The effects of using the web-based double eye control program on medication of high risk drugs in pediatric patients. Doctorate Thesis. 2018. Izmir: Ege University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Accessed June 20, 2025.
  3. [26]26. Perry AG Potter PA. Mosby’s Pocket Guide to Basic Skills and Procedures (Nursing Pocket Guides). 8th ed. Mosby. 2014: 230– 375.
  4. [27]27. Hall AM Ostendorf WR. Medication Administration. In: Potter PA Perry AG Stockert PA Hall A, eds. Fundamentals of Nursing. 9th ed. Mosby; 2013: 648– 73.
  5. [28]28. Skidmore-Roth L. Mosby’s Drug Guide for Nursing Students-E-Book. 28th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.
  6. [31]31. Taketomo C Hodding J Kraus D. Lexicomp American Pharmacists Association Pediatric&Neonatal Dosage Handbook with International Trade names Index. Wolters Kluwer Clinical Drug Information; 2015.
  7. [37]37. Musharyanti L Claramita M Haryanti F Dwiprahasto I. Why do nursing students make medication errors? A qualitative study in Indonesia. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019; 14: 282– 8. 31435418 PMC6694917
  8. [42]42. Nieuwlaat R Wilczynski N Navarro T. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014: CD000011. 25412402 PMC7263418

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özgüven Öztornaci, B., Karakul, A., Ardahan Akgül, E., Doğan, P., Yildirim Sari, H., & Başbakkal, Z.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pediatric Nursing, İzmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye
  • Tarsus University (TR)
  • Ege University (TR)
Venue
Medicine
Published
2025-12-05
Volume
104
Issue
49
Pages
e46222
ISSN
  • 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5964
OpenAlex
W4417063848
Cited by
1
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
pediatric medication errors, simulation-based training, nursing students, medication administration, patient safety, medication error prevention, pediatric nursing education
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Child, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Medication Errors, Pediatric Nursing, Students, Nursing, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review