Cited by 33Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchHepatitis C virus researchNigella sativa pharmacological applications

Cannabis in liver disorders: a friend or a foe?

Goyal, Hemant, Rahman, M. Rubayat, Perisetti, Abhilash, Shah, Nihar, Chhabra, Rajiv·2018·European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

The recent legalization of recreational marijuana use in some parts of the world, the discovery of new indications for the clinical application of cannabis, and the acceptance of the use of cannabis in practice has been paralleled by extensive research on the active components of cannabis and the endocannabinoid system within the human body. In this review, we evaluate the available evidence on cannabis and its constituents and the application of this evidence in clinical practice, focusing particularly on the liver and liver diseases. Constituents of cannabis, such as cannabidiol and Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have shown anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and hepatoprotective effects both in in vitro and clinical studies, and appear to have potential in the symptom management and treatment of various liver diseases that were previously considered difficult to manage conservatively. In addition, the manipulation of the inherent endocannabinoid response system has found favor in many clinical fields and has generated considerable research and clinical interest. Moreover, evidence with regard to the adverse effects of marijuana use in liver diseases is weak, which has led to raise a question on the prior rules, with regard to a denial of liver transplantation to marijuana users. All in all, the recent trends in research, clinical experiences, as well as the legislature, has opened up new avenues towards the widespread clinical application of cannabis and its derivatives as well as modifiers of the components of the endocannabinoid system. More research is required to fully exploit these new evidences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/meg.0000000000001256

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goyal, H., Rahman, M. R., Perisetti, A., Shah, N., & Chhabra, R.
Affiliations
  • Mercer University (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Goyal, Hemant
Venue
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2018-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1283-1290
ISSN
0954-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888820089
Cited by
33
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
Keywords
cannabis, liver disease, endocannabinoid system, cannabidiol, tetrahydrocannabinol, hepatoprotection, anti-inflammatory activity, antioxidant activity, liver transplantation, cannabis use, recreational cannabis legalization, symptom management
MeSH terms
Animals, Cannabinoids, Marijuana Abuse, Humans, Liver, Liver Diseases, Marijuana Smoking, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Signal Transduction, Endocannabinoids, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review