Cited by 112Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Effect of fermented milk-based probiotic preparations on Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Sachdeva, Aarti, Nagpal, Jitender·2009·European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of fermented milk-based probiotic preparations on Helicobacter pylori eradication. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases and hand search of reviews, bibliographies of books and abstracts and proceedings of international conferences. REVIEW METHODS: Included trials had to be randomized or quasi-randomized and controlled, using fermented milk-based probiotics in the intervention group, treating Helicobacter-infected patients and evaluating improvement or eradication of H. pylori as an outcome. RESULTS: The search identified 10 eligible randomized controlled trials. Data were available for 963 patients, of whom 498 were in the treatment group and 465 in the control group. The pooled odds ratio (studies n=9) for eradication by intention-to-treat analysis in the treatment versus control group was 1.91 (1.38-2.67; P<0.0001) using the fixed effects model; test for heterogeneity (Cochran's Q=5.44; P=0.488). The pooled risk difference was 0.10 (95% CI 0.05-0.15; P<0.0001) by the fixed effects model (Cochran's Q=13.41; P=0.144). The pooled odds ratio for the number of patients with any adverse effect was 0.51 (95% CI 0.10-2.57; P=0.41; random effects model; heterogeneity by Cochran's Q=68.5; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fermented milk-based probiotic preparations improve H. pylori eradication rates by approximately 5-15%, whereas the effect on adverse effects is heterogeneous.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/meg.0b013e32830d0eff

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachdeva, A., & Nagpal, J.
Affiliations
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Nagpal, Jitender
Venue
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2009-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
45-53
ISSN
0954-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069978507
Cited by
112
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Helicobacter pylori, probiotics, fermented milk, probiotic therapy, Helicobacter pylori eradication, adverse effects, Helicobacter infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Helicobacter pylori, Helicobacter Infections, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Cultured Milk Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review