Cited by 54Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCultural Competency in Health CareDiversity and Career in Medicine

Race/Ethnicity and Health Care Communication: Does Patient-Provider Concordance Matter?

Sweeney, Casey F., Zinner, Darren, Rust, George, Fryer, George E.·2016·Medical Care

Abstract

Background: Although many minority patients would prefer a provider of their own race/ethnicity, the influence of this relationship on patient-provider communication remains unknown. This analysis examined the effect of patient-provider race/ethnicity concordance on patient-reported provider communication quality using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey years 2002–2012. Methods: Ordinary least squares regressions were executed on communication rating, measured by the Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems. Results: Only 13.8% of black, non-Hispanic patients reported their usual source of care provider matched their race/ethnicity, compared with 94.4% of white, non-Hispanic patients and 43.8% of Hispanic patients. Differences in communication ratings were driven by patient race, rather than provider race. Although black, non-Hispanic patients rate their communication significantly higher than their counterparts overall, there was no significant influence of patient-provider racial concordance on ratings of communication when controlling for other sociodemographic variables. Conclusions: Minorities may seek the services of minority providers, but they are not more satisfied with patient-provider communication experience than when in race-discordant provider arrangements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000578

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweeney, C. F., Zinner, D., Rust, G., & Fryer, G. E.
Affiliations
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
  • Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Sweeney, Casey F.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2016-11
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
1005-1009
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2405249750
Cited by
54
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
race and ethnicity, patient-provider communication, communication quality, racial disparities in health care, minority patients, Black patients, Hispanic patients, usual source of care, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Communication, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Patient Satisfaction, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review