Cited by 99Pancreatic function and diabetesTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Long-term outcome after pancreas transplantation

Gruessner, Angelika C., Sutherland, David E.R., Gruessner, Rainer W.G.·2012·Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation

Abstract

Purpose of review Pancreas transplantation provides the only proven method to restore long-term normoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Although many studies describe the very important risk factors for short-term survival of a pancreas transplant, there is not a lot of information available about factors that distinguish short-term from long-term graft function. Recent findings The analysis of 18,159 pancreas transplants from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry, performed from 25 July 1978 to 31 December 2005, showed an improvement not only in short-term but also in long-term graft function. Most recent 5-year, 10-year and 20-year graft function for transplants with the appropriate follow-up time showed 80, 68 and 45%, respectively, for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants; 62, 46 and 16%, respectively, for pancreas after kidney; and 59, 39 and 12%, respectively, for pancreas transplants alone. Important factors influencing long-term function were factors that described the quality of the deceased donor. Pancreas transplants in younger or African-American recipients showed a higher risk of graft failure. Anti-T-cell induction therapy had a significant impact on long-term survival in solitary transplants. Summary With a careful donor selection, not only short-term but also long-term pancreas graft function and, therefore, good metabolic control can be achieved for the diabetic patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mot.0b013e32834ee700

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruessner, A. C., Sutherland, D. E. R., & Gruessner, R. W. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gruessner, Angelika C.
  • Gruessner, Rainer W.G.
Venue
Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
Published
2012-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
100-105
ISSN
1087-2418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995712646
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
pancreas transplantation, long-term graft function, graft failure, type 1 diabetes, normoglycemia, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, donor age, African American recipients, metabolic control
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Decision Making, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, Graft Survival, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunosuppression Therapy, Insulin, Time Factors, Waiting Lists, Logistic Models, Kidney Transplantation, Pancreas Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Living Donors, Renal Insufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review