Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,526

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology

Shimosegawa, Tooru, Chari, Suresh T., Frulloni, Luca, Kamisawa, Terumi, Kawa, Shigeyuki, Mino-Kenudson, Mari, Kim, Myung-Hwan, Klöppel, Günter, Lerch, Markus M., Löhr, Matthias, Notohara, Kenji, Okazaki, Kazuichi, Schneider, Alexander, Zhang, Lizhi·2011·Pancreas

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To achieve the goal of developing international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). METHODS: An international panel of experts met during the 14th Congress of the International Association of Pancreatology held in Fukuoka, Japan, from July 11 through 13, 2010. The proposed criteria represent a consensus opinion of the working group. RESULTS: Autoimmune pancreatitis was classified into types 1 and 2. The ICDC used 5 cardinal features of AIP, namely, imaging of pancreatic parenchyma and duct, serology, other organ involvement, pancreatic histology, and an optional criterion of response to steroid therapy. Each feature was categorized as level 1 and 2 findings depending on the diagnostic reliability. The diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 AIP can be definitive or probable, and in some cases, the distinction between the subtypes may not be possible (AIP-not otherwise specified). CONCLUSIONS: The ICDC for AIP were developed based on the agreement of an international panel of experts in the hope that they will promote worldwide recognition of AIP. The categorization of AIP into types 1 and 2 should be helpful for further clarification of the clinical features, pathogenesis, and natural history of these diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182142fd2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 1,526

Metadata

Authors
Shimosegawa, T., Chari, S. T., Frulloni, L., Kamisawa, T., Kawa, S., Mino-Kenudson, M., Kim, M.-H., Klöppel, G., Lerch, M. M., Löhr, M., Notohara, K., Okazaki, K., Schneider, A., & Zhang, L.
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2011-04
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
352-358
ISSN
0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143651115
Cited by
1,526
References
20
FWCI
68.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182142fd2
The paper
Shimosegawa, T., Chari, S. T., Frulloni, L., Kamisawa, T., Kawa, S., Mino-Kenudson, M., Kim, M.-H., Klöppel, G., Lerch, M. M., Löhr, M., Notohara, K., Okazaki, K., Schneider, A., & Zhang, L. (2011). International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0b013e3182142fd2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.