Cited by 22Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareCeliac Disease Research and ManagementChild and Adolescent Health

Frequency and Predictors of Successful Transition of Care for Young Adults With Childhood Celiac Disease

Reilly, Norelle R., Hammer, Marissa L., Ludvigsson, Jonas F., Green, Peter H.·2020·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives Transition from pediatric to adult care for individuals with chronic conditions is important to prevent gaps in care, though this has not been well-studied in celiac disease (CD). The aim of this study was to discern rates and predictors of successful transition of care for young adults with childhood-diagnosed CD. Methods An anonymous 21-question online survey was sent to individuals on our center's email contact list seeking responses from those ages 18 to 25 years diagnosed with CD before age 18 years. Information collected included method of diagnosis, demographics, CD-related care, reasons for not seeking care, and symptoms. Results Respondents (n = 98), 70% women, had a median age of 21 years (IQR 19--23 years). The majority were full or part-time students (67%; 95% CI 59%-77%). Only 31% of respondents had successfully transitioned to an adult CD provider. Some 37% (95% CI 29%-48%) were not receiving any CD medical care. An older age at diagnosis was associated with successful transition to adult gastroenterology (P = 0.002) as well as with greater symptom scores (P = 0.002). Receiving a referral for ongoing adult CD care predicted successful transition to an adult provider (odds ratio [OR] 3.92, 95% CI 1.58-9.72). Conclusions Transition of care for young adults with CD is inconsistent, particularly among asymptomatic patients. Receipt of a referral for an adult provider significantly improves follow-up rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002568

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reilly, N. R., Hammer, M. L., Ludvigsson, J. F., & Green, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics New York NY
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Reilly, Norelle R.
  • Hammer, Marissa L.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
190-194
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2995235520
Cited by
22
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Social Science Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
celiac disease, care transitions, transition to adult care, young adults, age at diagnosis, asymptomatic patients, care gaps
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Celiac Disease, Child, Female, Gastroenterology, Humans, Male, Patient Transfer, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Transition to Adult Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review