Cited by 36Immune Response and InflammationInfant Nutrition and HealthSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

LPS-binding protein enables intestinal epithelial restitution despite LPS exposure

Open access
Richter, Juli M., Schanbacher, Brandon L., Huang, Hong, Xue, Jianjing, Bauer, John A., Giannone, Peter J.·2012·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intestinal epithelial restitution is the first part in the process of mucosal repair after injury in the intestine. Integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier is important as a first line of defense against bacteria and endotoxin. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in extremely-low-birth-weight infants, but its mechanisms are not well defined. Abnormal bacterial colonization, immature barrier function, innate immunity activation, and inflammation likely play a role. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) is secreted by enterocytes in response to inflammatory stimuli and has concentration-dependent effects. At basal concentrations, LBP stimulates the inflammatory response by presenting LPS to its receptor; however, at high concentrations, LBP is able to neutralize LPS and prevent an exaggerated inflammatory response. We sought to determine how LBP would affect wound healing in an in vitro model of intestinal cell restitution and protect against intestinal injury in a rodent model of NEC. METHODS: Immature intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6) were seeded in poly-L-lysine-coated 8-chamber slides and grown to confluence. A 500-μm wound was created using a cell scraper mounted on the microscope to achieve uniform wounding. Media was replaced with media containing LPS ± LBP. Slide wells were imaged after 0, 8, and 24 hours and then fixed. Cellular restitution was evaluated via digital images captured on an inverted microscope and wound closure was determined by automated analysis. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) was determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction after RNA isolation from wounded cells 24 hours after treatment. RESULTS: LPS alone attenuated wound healing in immature intestinal epithelium. This attenuation is reversed by 24 hours with increasing concentrations of LBP so that wound healing is equivalent to control (P < 0.001). TLR4 was increased with LPS alone but levels returned to that of control after addition of LBP in the higher concentrations. LBP had no effect on the development of intestinal injury when given during our rodent model of NEC. Abnormal bacterial colonization and activation of innate immunity by LPS are likely involved in the pathogenesis of NEC.The attenuation of wound healing was reversed when LBP was added to LPS but only in the higher concentrations. At these same concentrations of LBP, TLR4 was decreased to that of control. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that LBP may be a novel therapeutic strategy to facilitate wound healing after the acute phase of NEC and other forms of intestinal injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e31823a895a

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age-related changes in the microbiota toward gram-negative and endotoxigenic bacteria are known to induce cellular senescence and apoptosis in endothelial cells and damage to intestinal epithelial cells and gut-associated lymphoid tissues, thereby disrupting intestinal epithelial barrier integrity.

    “Furthermore, age-related changes in the microbiota toward gram-negative and endotoxigenic bacteria are known to induce cellular senescence and apoptosis in endothelial cells and damage to intestinal epithelial cells and gut-associated lymphoid tissues thereby disrupting the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity (50–54).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richter, J. M., Schanbacher, B. L., Huang, H., Xue, J., Bauer, J. A., & Giannone, P. J.
Affiliations
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Giannone, Peter J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
639-644
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2059442923
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1K23DK078909)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, intestinal epithelial restitution, intestinal wound healing, necrotizing enterocolitis, lipopolysaccharide, TLR4, intestinal barrier, intestinal injury, bacterial colonization, innate immunity, extremely low birth weight infants, IEC-6 cells, therapeutic target, endotoxin neutralization, inflammation reduction, intestinal epithelium
MeSH terms
Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein, Acute Disease, Acute-Phase Proteins, Administration, Oral, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cell Line, Disease Models, Animal, Epithelial Cells, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Lipopolysaccharides, Membrane Glycoproteins, Wound Healing, Signal Transduction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Enterocytes, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review