Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral Microbial Profile Discriminates Breast‐fed From Formula‐fed Infants

Open access
Holgerson, Pernilla L., Vestman, Nelly R., Claesson, Rolf, Öhman, Carina, Domellöf, Magnus, Tanner, Anne C.R., Hernell, Olle, Johansson, Ingegerd·2013·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about the effect of diet on the oral microbiota of infants, although diet is known to affect the gut microbiota. The aims of the present study were to compare the oral microbiota in breast‐fed and formula‐fed infants, and investigate growth inhibition of streptococci by infant‐isolated lactobacilli. Methods: A total of 207 mothers consented to participation of their 3‐month‐old infants. A total of 146 (70.5%) infants were exclusively and 38 (18.4%) partially breast‐fed, and 23 (11.1%) were exclusively formula‐fed. Saliva from all of their infants was cultured for Lactobacillus species, with isolate identifications from 21 infants. Lactobacillus isolates were tested for their ability to suppress Streptococcus mutans and S sanguinis. Oral swabs from 73 infants were analysed by the Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray (HOMIM) and by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for Lactobacillus gasseri. Results: Lactobacilli were cultured from 27.8% of exclusively and partially breast‐fed infants, but not from formula‐fed infants. The prevalence of 14 HOMIM‐detected taxa, and total salivary lactobacilli counts differed by feeding method. Multivariate modelling of HOMIM‐detected bacteria and possible confounders clustered samples from breast‐fed infants separately from formula‐fed infants. The microbiota of breast‐fed infants differed based on vaginal or C‐section delivery. Isolates of L plantarum, L gasseri, and L vaginalis inhibited growth of the cariogenic S mutans and the commensal S sanguinis: L plantarum >L gasseri >L vaginalis. Conclusions: The microbiota of the mouth differs between 3‐month‐old breast‐fed and formula‐fed infants. Possible mechanisms for microbial differences observed include species suppression by lactobacilli indigenous to breast milk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e31826f2bc6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Holgerson, P. L., Vestman, N. R., Claesson, R., Öhman, C., Domellöf, M., Tanner, A. C. R., Hernell, O., & Johansson, I.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2089105946
Cited by
194
References
5
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Microbial Profile Discriminates Breast‐fed From Formula‐fed Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpg.0b013e31826f2bc6
The paper
Holgerson, P. L., Vestman, N. R., Claesson, R., Öhman, C., Domellöf, M., Tanner, A. C. R., Hernell, O., & Johansson, I. (2013). Oral Microbial Profile Discriminates Breast‐fed From Formula‐fed Infants. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e31826f2bc6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.