Cited by 13Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipHealth Sciences Research and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ripe for Disruption? Adopting Nurse-Led Data Science and Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Reduce Hospital-Acquired Outcomes in the Learning Health System

Linnen, Daniel T., Javed, Priscilla S., D'Alfonso, Jim N.·2019·Nursing Administration Quarterly

Abstract

Nurse leaders are dually responsible for resource stewardship and the delivery of high-quality care. However, methods to identify patient risk for hospital-acquired conditions are often outdated and crude. Although hospitals and health systems have begun to use data science and artificial intelligence in physician-led projects, these innovative methods have not seen adoption in nursing. We propose the Petri dish model, a theoretical hybrid model, which combines population ecology theory and human factors theory to explain the cost/benefit dynamics influencing the slow adoption of data science for hospital-based nursing. The proliferation of nurse-led data science in health systems may be facing several barriers: a scarcity of doctorally prepared nurse scientists with expertise in data science; internal structural inertia; an unaligned national “precision health” strategy; and a federal reimbursement landscape, which constrains—but does not negate the hard dollar business case. Nurse executives have several options: deferring adoption, outsourcing services, and investing in internal infrastructure to develop and implement risk models. The latter offers the best performing models. Progress in nurse-led data science work has been sluggish. Balanced partnerships with physician experts and organizational stakeholders are needed, as is a balanced PhD-DNP research-practice collaboration model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/naq.0000000000000356

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Adler, 2018, Impact of inpatient harms on hospital finances and patient clinical outcomes, J Patient Saf, 14, 67, 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000171 · DOI
  2. Waugh, 2016, Inter-rater agreement of pressure ulcer risk and prevention measures in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators((R)) (NDNQI), Res Nurs Health, 39, 164, 10.1002/nur.21717 · DOI
  3. Garrard, 2016, Reliability and validity of the NDNQI(R) injury falls measure, West J Nurs Res, 38, 111, 10.1177/0193945914542851 · DOI
  4. Tchouaket, 2017, The economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 medical-surgical units: retrospective and matching analysis, J Adv Nurs, 73, 1696, 10.1111/jan.13260 · DOI
  5. Mushta, 2018, Failure to rescue as a nurse-sensitive indicator, Nurs Forum, 53, 84, 10.1111/nuf.12215 · DOI
  6. Porter-O'Grady, 2018, Guest editorial, Nurs Adm Q, 42, 2, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000270 · DOI
  7. Bodenheimer, 2014, From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider, Ann Fam Med, 12, 573, 10.1370/afm.1713 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Liu, 2016, Data that drive: closing the loop in the learning hospital system, J Hosp Med, 11, S11, 10.1002/jhm.2651 · DOI
  9. Bergstrom, 1987, The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk, Nurs Res, 36, 205, 10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Schmid, 1990, 1989 Federal Nursing Service Award Winner. Reducing patient falls: a research-based comprehensive fall prevention program, Mil Med, 155, 202, 10.1093/milmed/155.5.202 · DOI
  11. Subbe, 2001, Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions, QJM, 94, 521, 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521 · DOI
  12. Patel, 2018, Can early warning scores identify deteriorating patients in pre-hospital settings? A systematic review, Resuscitation, 132, 101, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.028 · DOI
  13. Linnen, 2019, Statistical modeling and aggregate-weighted scoring systems in prediction of mortality and ICU transfer: a systematic review, J Hosp Med, 14, 161, 10.12788/jhm.3151 · DOI
  14. Hyun, 2013, Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units, Am J Crit Care, 22, 514, 10.4037/ajcc2013991 · DOI
  15. Alderden, 2018, Predicting pressure injury in critical care patients: a machine-learning model, Am J Crit Care, 27, 461, 10.4037/ajcc2018525 · DOI
  16. Christensen, 2015, What is disruptive innovation, Harvard Bus Rev, 93, 44
  17. Westra, 2015, Nursing knowledge: big data science-implications for nurse leaders, Nurs Adm Q, 39, 304, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000130 · DOI
  18. Westra, 2017, Big data science: a literature review of nursing research exemplars, Nurs Outlook, 65, 549, 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.11.021 · DOI
  19. Linnen, 2016, The promise of big data: improving patient safety and nursing practice, Nursing, 46, 28, 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000482256.71143.09 · DOI
  20. Westra, 2015, A national action plan for sharable and comparable nursing data to support practice and translational research for transforming health care, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 22, 600, 10.1093/jamia/ocu011 · DOI
  21. Delaney, 2018, 2018 Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science Initiative, Comput Inform Nurs, 36, 473, 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000486 · DOI
  22. Amarasingham, 2016, Consensus Statement on Electronic Health Predictive Analytics: A Guiding Framework to Address Challenges, EGEMS (Wash DC), 4, 1163
  23. Bates, 2014, Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients, Health Aff (Millwood), 33, 1123, 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Parikh, 2016, Integrating predictive analytics into high-value care: the dawn of precision delivery, JAMA, 315, 651, 10.1001/jama.2015.19417 · DOI
  25. Linnen, 2018, Risk adjustment for hospital characteristics reduces unexplained hospital variation in pressure injury risk, Nurs Res, 67, 314, 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000287 · DOI
  26. Berwick, 2012, Eliminating waste in US health care, JAMA, 307, 1513, 10.1001/jama.2012.362 · DOI
  27. Mooney, 2015, Commentary: epidemiology in the era of big data, Epidemiology, 26, 390, 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000274 · DOI
  28. Acquaviva, 2013, Human cognition and the dynamics of failure to rescue: the Lewis Blackman case, J Prof Nurs, 29, 95, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.009 · DOI
  29. Reason, 1995, Understanding adverse events: human factors, Qual Health Care, 4, 80, 10.1136/qshc.4.2.80 · DOI
  30. Roth, 2015, Hospital nurses’ perceptions of human factors contributing to nursing errors, J Nurs Adm, 45, 263, 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000196 · DOI
  31. Henly, 2015, Integrating emerging areas of nursing science into PhD programs, Nurs Outlook, 63, 408, 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.04.010 · DOI
  32. Hannan, 1977, The population ecology of organizations, Am J Sociol, 82, 929, 10.1086/226424 · DOI
  33. Winters, 2013, Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review, Ann Intern Med, 158, 417, 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Manojlovich, 2007, Power and empowerment in nursing: looking backward to inform the future, Online J Issues Nurs, 12, 2, 10.3912/OJIN.Vol12No01Man01 · DOI
  35. Bindman, 2018, Funding innovation in a learning health care system, JAMA, 319, 119, 10.1001/jama.2017.18205 · DOI
  36. Paulson, 2017, Legal and ethical concerns of big data: predictive analytics, Clin Nurse Spec, 31, 237, 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000315 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Linnen, D. T., Javed, P. S., & D'Alfonso, J. N.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Linnen, Daniel T.
Venue
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Published
2019-07
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
246-255
ISSN
0363-9568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948180748
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Administration Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in nursing, hospital-acquired conditions, learning health systems, technology adoption barriers, population ecology theory, nurse researchers, precision health, reimbursement policy, risk prediction model, nursing leadership, research-practice collaboration, DNP
MeSH terms
Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, Data Collection, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ripe for Disruption? Adopting Nurse-Led Data Science and Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Reduce Hospital-Acquired Outcomes in the Learning Health System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/naq.0000000000000356
The paper
Linnen, D. T., Javed, P. S., & D'Alfonso, J. N. (2019). Ripe for Disruption? Adopting Nurse-Led Data Science and Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Reduce Hospital-Acquired Outcomes in the Learning Health System. Nursing Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000356