Cited by 21Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Hyperphosphorylated Tau in the Occipital Cortex in Aged Nondemented Subjects

Pikkarainen, Maria, Kauppinen, Tarja, Alafuzoff, Irina·2009·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

To determine the extent of neurodegeneration of the visual association cortex, we assessed hyperphosphorylated tau-immunoreactive (HPtau-IR) neurofibrillary tangles in Brodmann Areas 18/19 in nondemented and demented subjects. At least occasional HPtau-IR neurofibrillary tangles were seen in 24% of 59 nondemented subjects with ages at death ranging from 42 to 87 years. The incidence increased to 41% in the 32 nondemented subjects who had HPtau-IR pathology in the hippocampal region. Demented subjects with Braak Stages 0 to III and corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TAR DNA binding protein 43, vascular cognitive impairment, or dementia with Lewy bodies also had HPtau-IR pathology in Brodmann Areas 18/19. These results support the concept that the occipital association area may have enhanced vulnerability to neurodegeneration. Neuropathologic assessment of these areas is, therefore, recommended, particularly in subjects suspected or known to have had mild cognitive impairment. Occasional HPtau-IR lesions were also seen in the medial temporal gyrus. Thus, the question as to whether scattered HPtau-IR lesions in either temporal or occipital cortex indicate a neurodegenerative disease remains unresolved. Further systematic clinicopathologic studies are needed for an understanding of regional susceptibility to neurodegeneration and the significance of scattered HPtau-IR brain lesions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nen.0b013e3181a6ee45

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pikkarainen, M., Kauppinen, T., & Alafuzoff, I.
Affiliations
Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
2009-06
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
653-660
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020206355
Cited by
21
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
hyperphosphorylated tau, neurofibrillary tangles, occipital cortex, visual association cortex, neurodegeneration, aging, dementia, Braak stages, corticobasal degeneration, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, vascular cognitive impairment, dementia with Lewy bodies, medial temporal gyrus, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Autopsy, Body Weight, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occipital Lobe, Phosphorylation, Chi-Square Distribution, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review