Cited by 467Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Staging of neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer's disease: A study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium

Open access
Alafuzoff, Irina, Arzberger, Thomas, Al‐Sarraj, Safa, Bodi, Istvan, Bogdanovic, Nenad, Braak, Heiko, Bugiani, Orso, Del‐Tredici, Kelly +22 more·2008·Brain Pathology

Abstract

It has been recognized that molecular classifications will form the basis for neuropathological diagnostic work in the future. Consequently, in order to reach a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the presence of hyperphosphorylated tau (HP-tau) and beta-amyloid protein in brain tissue must be unequivocal. In addition, the stepwise progression of pathology needs to be assessed. This paper deals exclusively with the regional assessment of AD-related HP-tau pathology. The objective was to provide straightforward instructions to aid in the assessment of AD-related immunohistochemically (IHC) detected HP-tau pathology and to test the concordance of assessments made by 25 independent evaluators. The assessment of progression in 7-microm-thick sections was based on assessment of IHC labeled HP-tau immunoreactive neuropil threads (NTs). Our results indicate that good agreement can be reached when the lesions are substantial, i.e., the lesions have reached isocortical structures (stage V-VI absolute agreement 91%), whereas when only mild subtle lesions were present the agreement was poorer (I-II absolute agreement 50%). Thus, in a research setting when the extent of lesions is mild, it is strongly recommended that the assessment of lesions should be carried out by at least two independent observers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00147.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Al‐Sarraj, S., Bodi, I., Bogdanovic, N., Braak, H., Bugiani, O., Del‐Tredici, K., Ferrer, I., Gelpi, E., Giaccone, G., Graeber, M. B., Ince, P., Kamphorst, W., King, A., Korkolopoulou, P., Kovács, G. G., Larionov, S., Meyronet, D., Monoranu, C., Parchi, P., Patsouris, E., Roggendorf, W., Seilhean, D., Tagliavini, F., Stadelmann, C., Streichenberger, N., Thal, D. R., Wharton, S. B., & Kretzschmar, H.
Affiliations
  • Institut für Neuropathologie (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Netherlands Brain Bank (NL)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Országos Pszichiátriai és Neurológiai Intézet (HU)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Alafuzoff, Irina
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-03
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
484-496
ISSN
  • 1015-6305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3639
OpenAlex
W2107960095
Cited by
467
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neurofibrillary pathology, hyperphosphorylated tau, neuropil threads, interobserver agreement, immunohistochemistry, regional assessment, molecular classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Staining and Labeling, Observer Variation, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Neocortex, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review