Cited by 7Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsCultural Competency in Health CareHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Use of Traditional Birth Practices by Chinese Women in the United States

Saito, Maki, Lyndon, Audrey·2017·MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of our study was to explore how foreign-born Chinese women living in California engage in various traditional and American birth practices. Study design and methods A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using a grounded theory approach. Chinese women from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan who had childbirth experiences in the United States were purposively sampled. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 women, with follow-up interviews with 5 women. Interview data were analyzed using grounded theory according to the method of Strauss and Corbin. Results There are many traditional practices for pregnancy and childbirth. Women investigated the traditions through various means, and built their own perspective on each tradition by integrating an evaluation of the Chinese perspective and an evaluation of the American perspective. Women considered several factors in the process of evaluating the Chinese and American perspectives to reach their own integrated perspective on each tradition. These factors included whether or not the tradition made sense to them, how the traditional practice affected their comfort, nature of available options, attitudes of female elders, previous experiences of their peers and themselves, and outcomes of temporary trials of traditional or nontraditional practices. Clinical implications Healthcare providers should respect women's diverse perspectives on traditional practices and encourage flexible arrangements.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmc.0000000000000326

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saito, M., & Lyndon, A.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing
Published
2017-05
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
153-159
ISSN
0361-929X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588720493
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Keywords
traditional birth practices, Chinese immigrant women, childbirth, cultural integration, intergenerational influence, older women, immigrant health, childbirth decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Asian, California, China, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Middle Aged, Perception, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taiwan, Qualitative Research, Delivery, Obstetric, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review