Cited by 60Cultural Competency in Health CareMigration, Health and TraumaMigration, Identity, and Health

A descriptive phenomenology study of newcomers’ experience of maternity care services: Chinese women’s perspectives.

Open access
Lee, Tsorng-Yeh, Landy, Christine Kurtz, Wahoush, Olive, Khanlou, Nazilla, Liu, Yin-Chun, Li, Chia-Chi·2014·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternity health care available in Canada is based on the needs of women born in Canada and often lacks the flexibility to meet the needs of immigrant women. The purpose of this study was to explore immigrant Chinese women's experiences in accessing maternity care, the utilization of maternity health services, and the obstacles they perceived in Canada. METHODS: This descriptive phenomenology study used in-depth semi-structured interviews to examine immigrant Chinese women's experiences. Fifteen participants were recruited from the Chinese community in Toronto, Canada by using purposive sampling. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim into written Chinese. The transcripts were analyzed using Colaizzi's (1978) phenomenological method. RESULTS: Six themes were extracted from the interviews: (1) preference for linguistically and culturally competent healthcare providers, with obstetricians over midwives, (2) strategies to deal with the inconvenience of the Canadian healthcare system (3) multiple resources to obtain pregnancy information, (4) the merits of the Canadian healthcare system, (5) the need for culturally sensitive care, and (6) the emergence of alternative supports and the use of private services. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide new knowledge and understanding of immigrant Chinese women's experiences in accessing maternity health services within a large metropolitan Canadian city. Participants described two unique experiences within the themes: preference for linguistically and culturally competent healthcare providers, with obstetricians over midwives, and the emergence of alternative supports and the use of private services. Few studies of immigrant maternity service access have identified these experiences which may be linked to cultural difference. Further investigation with women from different cultural backgrounds is needed to develop a comprehensive understanding of immigrant women's experiences with maternity care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-14-114

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lower EOHCS-Episodic scores among people who have English as their first language may be explained in part by research showing that newcomers whose first language is not English tend to rate their satisfaction with care highly, reflecting appreciation for access to care that may be less accessible in their countries of origin.

    “The lower scores among people who have English as their first language may be explained, in part, by research showing that newcomers whose first language is not English tend to rate their satisfaction with care quite highly, reflecting some peoples’ appreciation for access to care that may be less accessible in their countries of origin [81–84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Qualitative research review guidelines – RATS http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/rats

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, T.-Y., Landy, C. K., Wahoush, O., Khanlou, N., Liu, Y.-C., & Li, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
  • National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Corresponding author
Lee, Tsorng-Yeh
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2014-03-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
114-114
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160055193
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
York University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
Keywords
maternity care access, immigrant health, culturally competent care, language barriers, pregnancy information, barriers to care, Toronto
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Canada, China, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Emigrants and Immigrants, Cultural Competency, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review