Parent Education is Changing: A Review of Smartphone Apps
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose was to critique existing parenting apps using established criteria and health literacy guidelines. Study Design: Descriptive methodology was used. Methods: The Apple App Store was searched using the terms parenting, child health, and infant health. To be included, the apps had to have relevant content (parenting, child health, or infant health), be in English, and contain parent education. After eliminating apps that failed to meet inclusion criteria from the original 203 apps, 46 apps were reviewed. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool was used to evaluate the health literacy subscales called Understandability and Actionability. Content analysis included Authority, Objectivity, Accuracy, Timeliness, and Usability. Results: The majority of the apps (70%) were in English only. The price ranged from free to $4.99. The purpose, target audience, and topics varied. Although all included apps were for parents, some were for more targeted groups of parents. The source of the information was not presented in 26% of the apps. Most apps took the user to a Web site or an article to read. Functionality of the apps was limited, with none of them providing a customized experience. Clinical Implications: Much development and research is needed before mobile health (mHealth) solutions can be recommended by nurses caring for new parents. It is critical that consumers and interdisciplinary professionals be involved in the early design phase of the product to ensure that the end product is acceptable and usable and that it will lead to healthy behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GAI offers promising support for parents by enhancing their ability to educate and engage with their children.
“GAI offers promising support for parents by enhancing their ability to educate and engage with their children.”
From SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
AI-driven systems can support parenting education and provide evidence-based advice through applications and chatbots, delivering micro-interventions.
“Prior work suggested that AI-driven systems can support parenting education [61] and provide evidence-based advice through applications and chatbots, delivering micro-interventions such as teaching parents how to praise their children effectively [11, 17] or offering strategies to teach complex concepts [55, 69].”
From SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Shoemaker, S. J., Wolf, M. S., & Brach, C. (2014) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027 · Cited by 1,366 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Healthcare Applications for Smartphones
Mosa, A. S. M., Yoo, I., & Sheets, L. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-67 · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification
Kamel Boulos, M. N., Brewer, A. C., Karimkhani, C., Buller, D. B., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2014) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Arnhold, M., Quade, M., & Kirch, W. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2968 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit
DeWalt, D. A., Broucksou, K. A., Hawk, V., Brach, C., Hink, A. B., Rudd, R. R., & Callahan, L. F. (2011) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Yin, H. S., Dreyer, B. P., Vivar, K. L., et al. (2012) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2012.01.001 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Attributes of a Health Literate Organization
Brach, C., Dreyer, B. P., Schyve, P. M., et al. (2012) · NAM Perspectives · doi:10.31478/201201f · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Social Media Use in Nursing Education
Schmitt, T. L., Sims-Giddens, S., & Booth, R. G. (2012) · OJIN The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing · doi:10.3912/ojin.vol17no03man02 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Powell, A. C., Torous, J. B., Chan, S. R., Raynor, G., Shwarts, E., Shanahan, M. E., & Landman, A. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5176 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Evaluation of Printed Health Education Materials for Use by Low‐Education Families
Ryan, L., Logsdon, M. C., McGill, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12076 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of mHealth Applications for Pre-Eclampsia Triage
Dunsmuir, D. T., Payne, B. A., Cloete, G., Petersen, C. L., Görges, M., Lim, J. M.-Y., von Dadelszen, P., Dumont, G. A., & Ansermino, J. M. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2014.2301156 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Logan, D. M., Hill, K. R., Jones, R., Holt‐Lunstad, J., & Larson, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2014.912614 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Pregnant women's interest in a website or mobile application for healthy gestational weight gain
Waring, M. E., Simas, T. A. M., Xiao, R. S., Lombardini, L., Allison, J. J., Rosal, M. C., & Pagoto, S. (2014) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2014.05.002 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Danbjørg, D. B., Wagner, L., & Clemensen, J. (2013) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.006 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Learning the ABCs of pregnancy and newborn care through mobile technology
Entsieh, A. A., Emmelin, M., & Pettersson, K. O. (2015) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v8.29340 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The role of literacy in health and health care.
DeWalt, D. A., & Pignone, M. P. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Logsdon, M. C., Bennett, G., Crutzen, R., Martin, L., Eckert, D., Robertson, A., Myers, J. A., Tomasulo, R., Gregg, J., Barone, M. J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1111/jcap.12083 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth Promotion in Pediatric Primary Care
Davis, D. W., Jones, V. F., Logsdon, M. C., Ryan, L., & Wilkerson-McMahon, M. (2013) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922813506607 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationFarrell, M. J. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5071 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Manganello, J. A., Gerstner, G. R., Pergolino, K., Graham, Y. J., & Strogatz, D. S. (2015) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-015-0169-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Feasibility of Two Educational Methods for Teaching New Mothers: A Pilot Study
Logsdon, M. C., Davis, D. W., Eckert, D., Smith, F. A., Stikes, R., Rushton, J., Myers, J. A., Capps, J., & Sparks, K. (2015) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.4583 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of social media and Internet to obtain health information by rural adolescent mothers
Logsdon, M. C., Mittelberg, M., & Myers, J. A. (2014) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2014.04.006 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationAcceptability and Initial Efficacy of Education for Teen Mothers
Logsdon, M. C., Davis, D. W., Stikes, R., et al. (2015) · MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · doi:10.1097/nmc.0000000000000126 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationManganello, J. A., Gerstner, G. R., Pergolino, K., Graham, Y. J., & Strogatz, D. S. (2016) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/publichealth.4442 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Baig, M. M., GholamHosseini, H., & Connolly, M. J. (2015) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7318586 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petsolari, M., Ibrahim, S. B., & Slovak, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642619 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot
Ho, H.-R., Kargeti, N., Liu, Z., & Mutlu, B. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713330 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davis, D. W., Logsdon, M. C., Vogt, K., Rushton, J., Myers, J., Lauf, A., & Hogan, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Venue
- MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 248-256
- ISSN
- 0361-929X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2694759995
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- parenting apps, mobile health, health literacy, parent education, infant health, child health, app quality assessment, PEMAT, usability, source disclosure
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Humans, Parents, Self Care, Health Literacy, Information Seeking Behavior, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review