Cited by 50Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Insufficient Dollars and Qualified Personnel to Meet United States Mental Health Needs

Weil, Thomas P.·2015·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The American populace currently supports the need for providing additional mental health services for adolescents who frequently express anger and mood instability and maybe are at risk for major psychiatric disorders and behavioral problems; Vietnam, Iraqi, and Afghanistan veterans or military personnel still on duty diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, or other similar combat-related disabilities; the approximately 1 million prisoners currently incarcerated primarily because of substance abuse and needing medically related rehabilitative services; and senior citizens who experience dementia and depression and require improved therapeutics. The problems outlined herein are as follows: far too limited monies are being spent for mental health services (5.6% of total US expenditures for health or roughly one fifth of what is consumed for hospital care); effective therapies are often lacking; and there is a shortage of qualified mental health personnel except in upscale urban and suburban areas. Unfortunately, these problems are so immense that, even with enhanced prioritization of our available resources, they are still not entirely solvable. The American public may continue to impart lip service when attempting to respond to our nation's mental health needs or may decide to spend vastly more money for such care. The latter choice may not be forthcoming in the near future for various cultural-societal-clinical-fiscal reasons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000271

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weil, T. P.
Corresponding author
Weil, Thomas P.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2015-04
Volume
203
Issue
4
Pages
233-240
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061730825
Cited by
50
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
mental health services, mental health funding, mental health workforce shortage, adolescents, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, incarcerated individuals, substance abuse, dementia, geriatric depression, mental health care costs, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Mental Health Services, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review