Cited by 136Emergency and Acute Care StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Effect of a Regional Dedicated Psychiatric Emergency Service on Boarding and Hospitalization of Psychiatric Patients in Area Emergency Departments

Open access
Zeller, Scott, Calma, Nicole, Stone, Ashley·2014·Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mental health patients boarding for long hours, even days, in United States emergency departments (EDs) awaiting transfer for psychiatric services has become a considerable and widespread problem. Past studies have shown average boarding times ranging from 6.8 hours to 34 hours. Most proposed solutions to this issue have focused solely on increasing available inpatient psychiatric hospital beds, rather than considering alternative emergency care designs that could provide prompt access to treatment and might reduce the need for many hospitalizations. One suggested option has been the "regional dedicated emergency psychiatric facility," which serves to evaluate and treat all mental health patients for a given area, and can accept direct transfers from other EDs. This study sought to assess the effects of a regional dedicated emergency psychiatric facility design known at the "Alameda Model" on boarding times and hospitalization rates for psychiatric patients in area EDs. METHODS: Over a 30-day period beginning in January 2013, 5 community hospitals in Alameda County, California, tracked all ED patients on involuntary mental health holds to determine boarding time, defined as the difference between when they were deemed stable for psychiatric disposition and the time they were discharged from the ED for transfer to the regional psychiatric emergency service. Patients were also followed to determine the percentage admitted to inpatient psychiatric units after evaluation and treatment in the psychiatric emergency service. RESULTS: In a total sample of 144 patients, the average boarding time was approximately 1 hour and 48 minutes. Only 24.8% were admitted for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization from the psychiatric emergency service. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the Alameda Model of transferring patients from general hospital EDs to a regional psychiatric emergency service reduced the length of boarding times for patients awaiting psychiatric care by over 80% versus comparable state ED averages. Additionally, the psychiatric emergency service can provide assessment and treatment that may stabilize over 75% of the crisis mental health population at this level of care, thus dramatically alleviating the demand for inpatient psychiatric beds. The improved, timely access to care, along with the savings from reduced boarding times and hospitalization costs, may well justify the costs of a regional psychiatric emergency service in appropriate systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5811/westjem.2013.6.17848

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our data was consistent with other studies that identified an excessive wait time of 20-40 hours on average for patients who are boarding, which grossly exceeds the Joint Commission's standard recommendation for disposition within four hours.

    “Overall, our data was consistent with other studies that have identified an excessive wait time of 20–40 hours on average for patients who are boarding, which grossly exceeds the Joint Commission’s standard recommendation for disposition within four hours (Leyenaar et al., 2021; Zeller et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeller, S., Calma, N., & Stone, A.
Affiliations
  • Alameda Health System (US)
  • Wright Institute (US)
  • California Hospital Association (US)
Corresponding author
Zeller, Scott
Venue
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2014
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 1936-900X (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-9018
OpenAlex
W2050861914
Cited by
136
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
psychiatric emergency care, emergency department boarding, boarding time, psychiatric hospitalization, regional mental health services, emergency department transfers
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, California, Emergency Service, Hospital, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Mental Health Services, Regional Medical Programs, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review