Cited by 23Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Service User Perspectives of a Psychoeducation Group for Individuals With a Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder: A Qualitative Study

O’ Connor, Caroline, Gordon, Olivia, Graham, Marie, Kelly, Finian, O’ Grady-Walshe, Ann·2008·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Group psychoeducation, incorporating cognitive-behavioral techniques, is increasingly used as part of the treatment package for bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to explore service-users' perspectives of a psychoeducation group which was run in the context of a community mental health service. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants who had completed a psychoeducation group for individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The verbatim transcripts of those interviews were analyzed using IPA. Three superordinate themes emerged from the data, including the treatment of bipolar disorder, perception of others, and learning from the group. From the perspectives of the service-users, positive working alliances with mental health professionals and the need for a treatment strategy that matches the individual's own approach to their illness were highlighted as benefits of participation in the group.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31817d0193

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Michalak, 2004, The role of psychoeducation in the treatment of bipolar disorder: a clinical perspective., Clinical Approaches in Bipolar Disorder, 3, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O’ Connor, C., Gordon, O., Graham, M., Kelly, F., & O’ Grady-Walshe, A.
Affiliations
Tallaght University Hospital (IE)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2008-07
Volume
196
Issue
7
Pages
568-571
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023952944
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
bipolar disorder, psychoeducation, group psychoeducation, service user perspectives, community mental health services, cognitive-behavioral techniques, therapeutic relationship, treatment preferences, person perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review