Cited by 115Stress Responses and CortisolPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Emotional Freedom Techniques on Stress Biochemistry: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Church, Dawson, Yount, Garret, Brooks, Audrey J.·2012·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study examined the changes in cortisol levels and psychological distress symptoms of 83 nonclinical subjects receiving a single hour long intervention. Subjects were randomly assigned to either an emotional freedom technique (EFT) group, a psychotherapy group receiving a supportive interviews (SI), or a no treatment (NT) group. Salivary cortisol assays were performed immediately before and 30 minutes after the intervention. Psychological distress symptoms were assessed using the symptom assessment-45. The EFT group showed statistically significant improvements in anxiety (-58.34%, p < 0.05), depression (-49.33%, p < 0.002), the overall severity of symptoms (-50.5%, p < 0.001), and symptom breadth (-41.93%, p < 0.001). The EFT group experienced a significant decrease in cortisol level (-24.39%; SE, 2.62) compared with the decrease observed in the SI (-14.25%; SE, 2.61) and NT (-14.44%; SE, 2.67) groups (p < 0.03). The decrease in cortisol levels in the EFT group mirrored the observed improvement in psychological distress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31826b9fc1

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baker, 2010, Emotional freedom techniques (EFT) reduces intense fears: A partial replication and extension of Wells, Polglase, Andrews, Carrington, Baker (2003)., Energy Psychol Theory Res Treat, 2, 13
  2. Dardik, 1996, The origin of disease and health, heart waves: The single solution to heart rate variability and ischemic preconditioning., Cycles, 46, 67
  3. Gallo, 2009, Energy psychology in rehabilitation: Origins, applications, and theory., Energy Psychol Theory Res Treat, 1, 57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Church, D., Yount, G., & Brooks, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Fetal Medicine Foundation (GB)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Church, Dawson
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2012-10
Volume
200
Issue
10
Pages
891-896
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041489646
Cited by
115
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
Emotional Freedom Technique, salivary cortisol, psychological distress, anxiety, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Saliva, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review