The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The State of Evidence-Based Practice in US Nurses: Critical Implications for Nurse Leaders and Educators
Abstract
This descriptive survey assessed the perception of evidence-based practice (EBP) among nurses in the United States. Although evidence-based healthcare results in improved patient outcomes and reduced costs, nurses do not consistently implement evidence-based best practices. A descriptive survey was conducted with a random sample of 1015 RNs who are members of the American Nurses Association. Although nurses believe in evidence-based care, barriers remain prevalent, including resistance from colleagues, nurse leaders, and managers. Differences existed in responses of nurses from Magnet® versus non-Magnet institutions as well as nurses with master's versus nonmaster's degrees. Nurse leaders and educators must provide learning opportunities regarding EBP and facilitate supportive cultures to achieve the Institute of Medicine's 2020 goal that 90% of clinical decisions be evidence-based.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2005) · Wolters Kluwer eBooks · Cited by 1,887
Self-citationBarriers: The barriers to research utilization scale
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 · Cited by 583
Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y.-L., Chang, Y.-K., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2011) · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010 · Cited by 450
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., & Mays, M. Z. (2008) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00126.x · Cited by 378
Self-citationMelnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Fischbeck Feinstein, N., Li, H., Small, L., Wilcox, L., & Kraus, R. (2004) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04024.x · Cited by 372
Self-citationWallen, G. R., Mitchell, S. A., Melnyk, B., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Miller‐Davis, C., Yates, J., & Hastings, C. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05442.x · Cited by 224
Self-citationImpact of Physician Asthma Care Education on Patient Outcomes
Cabana, M. D., Slish, K. K., Evans, D., Mellins, R. B., Brown, R. W., Lin, X., Kaciroti, N., & Clark, N. M. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1055 · Cited by 179
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Giggleman, M., & Cruz, R. (2010) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.002 · Cited by 173
Self-citationLevin, R. F., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Barnes, M., & Vetter, M. J. (2011) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/naq.0b013e31820320ff · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Cited by
Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2014) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12021 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L.
- Venue
- JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 410-417
- ISSN
- 0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334045214
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 51.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The State of Evidence-Based Practice in US Nurses: Critical Implications for Nurse Leaders and Educators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/nna.0b013e3182664e0a
- The paper
- Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The State of Evidence-Based Practice in US Nurses: Critical Implications for Nurse Leaders and Educators. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e3182664e0a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
