The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: nurses' perceptions, knowledge, and barriers
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides nurses with a method to use critically appraised and scientifically proven evidence for delivering quality health care to a specific population. The objective of this study was to explore nurses' awareness of, knowledge of, and attitude toward EBP and factors likely to encourage or create barriers to adoption. In addition, information sources used by nurses and their literature searching skills were also investigated. METHOD: A total of 2,100 copies of the questionnaire were distributed to registered nurses in 2 public hospitals in Singapore, and 1,486 completed forms were returned, resulting in a response rate of 70.8%. RESULTS: More than 64% of the nurses expressed a positive attitude toward EBP. However, they pointed out that due to heavy workload, they cannot keep up to date with new evidence. Regarding self-efficacy of EBP-related abilities, the nurses perceived themselves to possess moderate levels of skills. The nurses also felt that EBP training, time availability, and mentoring by nurses with EBP experience would encourage them to implement EBP. The top three barriers to adopting EBP were lack of time, inability to understand statistical terms, and inadequate understanding of the jargon used in research articles. For literature searching, nurses were using basic search features and less than one-quarter of them were familiar with Boolean and proximity operators. CONCLUSION: Although nurses showed a positive attitude toward EBP, certain barriers were hindering their smooth adoption. It is, therefore, desirable that hospital management in Southeast Asia, particularly in Singapore, develop a comprehensive strategy for building EBP competencies through proper training. Moreover, hospital libraries should also play an active role in developing adequate information literacy skills among the nurses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Sackett, D. L. (2000) · Cited by 5,950
Guyatt, G. H., Haynes, R. B., Jaeschke, R. Z., Cook, D. J., Green, L., Naylor, C. D., Wilson, M. C., Richardson, W. S., & for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.10.1290 · Cited by 748
Evidence-Based Practice: Beliefs, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviors of Physical Therapists
Jette, D. U., Bacon, K., Batty, C., Carlson, M., Ferland, A., Hemingway, R. D., Hill, J. C., Ogilvie, L., & Volk, D. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.9.786 · Cited by 728
Barriers: The barriers to research utilization scale
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 · Cited by 583
Pravikoff, D. S., Tanner, A. B., & Pierce, S. T. (2005) · AJN, American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-200509000-00025 · Cited by 580
Evidence Based Medicine—How to Practice and Teach EBM
Jones, K. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1410 · Cited by 525
Development of an evidence‐based practice questionnaire for nurses
Upton, D., & Upton, P. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03739.x · Cited by 447
Barriers to using research findings in practice: The clinician's perspective
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80062-x · Cited by 347
Implementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptions
DiCenso, A., Cullum, N., & Ciliska, D. (1998) · Evidence Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/ebn.1.2.38 · Cited by 302
SOLOMONS, N. M., & SPROSS, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x · Cited by 258
Cited by
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/nna.0b013e3182664e0a · Cited by 499
Parents experiences of pregnancy following perinatal loss: An integrative review
Donegan, G., Noonan, M., & Bradshaw, C. (2023) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2023.103673 · Cited by 84
Piredda, M., Fiorini, J., Facchinetti, G., Biagioli, V., Marchetti, A., Conti, F., Iacorossi, L., Giannarelli, D., Matarese, M., & De Marinis, M. G. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14941 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y.-L., Chang, Y.-K., & Mokhtar, I. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-236
- ISSN
- 1536-5050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9439
- OpenAlex
- W2099791390
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 38.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: nurses' perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010
- The paper
- Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y.-L., Chang, Y.-K., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2011). Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: nurses' perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.