The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurses' Perceived Knowledge, Beliefs, Skills, and Needs Regarding Evidence‐Based Practice: Implications for Accelerating the Paradigm Shift
Abstract
Background: The paradigm shift to evidence‐based nursing practice in the United States has been slow. Although multiple barriers to evidence‐based practice (EBP) have been identified through prior studies, there is a gap in the literature specifically identifying key variables (e.g., belief that EBP produces quality outcomes) that are correlated with the extent to which nurses engage in EBP. Aim: The primary aims of this study were to (1) describe nurses' knowledge, beliefs, skills, and needs regarding EBP; (2) determine whether relationships exist among these variables; and (3) describe major barriers and facilitators to EBP. Methods: A descriptive survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 160 nurses who were attending EBP conferences or workshops in four states located within the Eastern Region of the United States. Results: Although participant beliefs about the benefit of EBP were high, knowledge of EBP was relatively low. Significant relationships were found between the extent to which the nurses' practice is evidence‐based and (1) nurses' knowledge of EBP, (2) nurses' beliefs about the benefits of EBP, (3) having an EBP mentor, and (4) using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. Conclusion and Implications: Health care systems need to implement interventions that not only increase nurses' EBP knowledge and skills, but also strengthen their beliefs about the benefit of evidence‐based care. EBP mentors may be key in accelerating a more rapid shift toward evidence‐based nursing practice. Theoretically driven randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to test the effectiveness of interventions on advancing evidence‐based care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,483
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794 · Cited by 4,110
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.92.1.111 · Cited by 2,650
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,709
Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement
Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1637943 · Cited by 1,479
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationHealth Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality
Greiner, A. C., & Knebel, E. (2004) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2004.tb00473.x · Cited by 1,074
Changing Provider Behavior: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Grimshaw, J. M., Shirran, L., Thomas, R., Mowatt, G., Fraser, C., Bero, L., Grilli, R., Harvey, E., Oxman, A., & O’Brien, M. A. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200108002-00002 · Cited by 778
Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review
Estabrooks, C. A., Floyd, J. A., Scott‐Findlay, S., O'Leary, K. A., & Gushta, M. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x · Cited by 490
Cited by
Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2014) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12021 · Cited by 605
Self-citationMelnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/nna.0b013e3182664e0a · Cited by 499
Self-citationSOLOMONS, N. M., & SPROSS, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x · Cited by 258
Faculty Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers to Teaching Evidence-Based Nursing
Stichler, J. F., Fields, W., Kim, S. C., & Brown, C. E. (2011) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.012 · Cited by 94
A Conceptual Model for Growing Evidence-based Practice
Vratny, A., & Shriver, D. (2007) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/01.naq.0000264866.79711.08 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Fischbeck Feinstein, N., Li, H., Small, L., Wilcox, L., & Kraus, R.
- Venue
- Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-19
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 1545-102X (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6787
- OpenAlex
- W1994784352
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 22.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurses' Perceived Knowledge, Beliefs, Skills, and Needs Regarding Evidence‐Based Practice: Implications for Accelerating the Paradigm Shift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04024.x
- The paper
- Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Fischbeck Feinstein, N., Li, H., Small, L., Wilcox, L., & Kraus, R. (2004). Nurses' Perceived Knowledge, Beliefs, Skills, and Needs Regarding Evidence‐Based Practice: Implications for Accelerating the Paradigm Shift. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04024.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.