Cited by 45Social Media in Health EducationPatient Dignity and PrivacyCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Confidentiality, Accountability, and E-Professionalism in Relation to Facebook

Barnable, Alexia, Cunning, Glenda, Parcon, Mariel·2018·Nurse Educator

Abstract

This study examined nursing students’ perceptions of confidentiality, accountability, and e-professionalism in relation to Facebook. All of the students were aware that posting patients’ names and pictures of patients constituted a confidentiality breach. When comparing students based on educational status, there were differing opinions on whether employers should use Facebook profile information for hiring decisions. Nursing programs should provide current education, including clear and up-to-date policies, about social media use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nne.0000000000000441

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies found high social media use among students, ranging from 66.9% to 98.7%.

    “Studies that assessed SM use among different types of HCPs found high use among students, from 66.9% to 98.7% [40,43,50,51,60,61,64-66,68-70,102]”
  • Loosening accountability is a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on social media and damaging the professional image.

    “According to some studies in this review, loosening accountability can be seen as a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on SM [39,106,117] and damaging to the professional image [43, 45, 51, 56, 57, 59, 64, 66, 68, 70, 73, 102, 106, 112].”
  • Breaches of patient privacy were a concern for many different types of health care professionals.

    “Breaches of patient privacy was a concern for many different types of HCPs [34,43,47,57,91,94,97,107,111,119].”
  • Potential damage to professional image has been depicted by students as concerns about repercussions of their posts on career development or future employment, since employers are checking social media profiles of candidates.

    “Potential damage to the professional image has been depicted by students as concerns about repercussions of their posts on career development or future employment, since employers are checking SM profiles of candidates [43, 45, 51, 56, 57, 59, 66, 68, 70].”
  • 34% of nursing students were aware of other students who had breached patient confidentiality on Facebook.

    “However, 34% were aware of other students who had breached patient confidentiality on Facebook [43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnable, A., Cunning, G., & Parcon, M.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Barnable, Alexia
Venue
Nurse Educator
Published
2018-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
28-31
ISSN
  • 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9855
OpenAlex
W2751174695
Cited by
45
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
nursing students, Facebook, confidentiality, accountability, e-professionalism, social media use, patient privacy, hiring decisions, nursing education, social media policy
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Confidentiality, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Male, Social Responsibility, Students, Nursing, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review