Cited by 103Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Facebook and the professional behaviours of undergraduate medical students

Garner, Jayne, O’Sullivan, Helen·2010·The Clinical Teacher

Abstract

Summary: Background: The rapid growth and accessibility of social networking websites has fundamentally changed the way people manage information about their personal and professional lives. In particular, it has been suggested that interaction in virtual communities erodes elements of responsibility, accountability and social trust that build traditionally meaningful communities. The purpose of this study was to investigate how undergraduate medical students use the social network website Facebook, and to identify any unprofessional behaviour displayed online. Methods: A voluntary anonymous online survey was devised by the University of Liverpool, and emailed to students. Question topics included the use of Facebook, privacy settings, groups relating to the course and professional behaviours. Results were input to spss for analysis. Results: The response rate was 31 per cent ( n = 56). The majority of respondents did have a Facebook account and admitted there were photos they found embarrassing on the site. Over half of the respondents reported they had seen unprofessional behaviour by their colleagues on Facebook. Although students say that they are aware of the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) guidance, unprofessional behaviour is still demonstrated on the site. Discussion: This research highlights the issue of social networking websites and professionalism amongst medical students. Further guidance from the GMC and medical schools should remind students that images and information placed on social networking sites is in the public domain, and could impact upon their professional reputation and identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-498x.2010.00356.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garner, J., & O’Sullivan, H.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Garner, Jayne
Venue
The Clinical Teacher
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-19
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
112-115
ISSN
  • 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-498X
OpenAlex
W2056215801
Cited by
103
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
Facebook, social networking sites, medical students, professionalism, unprofessional behavior, online behavior, General Medical Council guidance, privacy settings, professional reputation, medical education
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Data Collection, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Medical, Social Identification, Social Perception, Social Support, Students, Medical, Privacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review