The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Reflection on Using ChatGPT in Student Learning: Benefits or Potential Risks?
Abstract
Chan, Maggie Mee Kie DHSc, RN; Wong, Isaac Shing Fun; Yau, Sui Ying; Lam, Veronica Suk Fun DN, MHA, RN, RM Author Information
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Over-reliance on external sources, including generative AI tools, without personal engagement and active learning, can hinder the development of essential skills and the depth of knowledge required for academic success (Chan et al., 2023).”
From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
The ChatGPT Storm and What Faculty Can Do
Sun, G. H., & Hoelscher, S. H. (2023) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000001390 · Cited by 305
Winkle, L. J. V., Thornock, B. O., Schwartz, B. D., Horst, A., Fisher, J. A., & Michels, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.976863 · Cited by 14
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 · Cited by 531
“Over-reli-ance on external sources, including generative AI tools, without personal engagement and active learning, can hinder the development of essential skills and the depth of knowledge required for academic success (Chan et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Influence of ChatGPT on Student Engagement: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100 · Cited by 392
Student Interaction with ChatGPT Can Promote Complex Critical Thinking Skills
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011 · Cited by 208
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Montayre, J. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323 · Cited by 90
Current status of ChatGPT use in medical education: potentials, challenges, and strategies
Xu, T., Weng, H., Liu, F., Yang, L., Luo, Y., Ding, Z., & Wang, Q. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/57896 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, M. M. K., Wong, I. S. F., Yau, S. Y., & Lam, V. S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Maggie Mee Kie
- Venue
- Nurse Educator
- Published
- 2023-06-20
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E200-E201
- ISSN
- 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9855
- OpenAlex
- W4381715627
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, student learning, critical reflection, artificial intelligence in education, nursing education
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Students, Nursing Education Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
