Cited by 72Ethics in Clinical ResearchSurvey Methodology and NonresponseMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Retention strategies in longitudinal studies with emerging adults

Open access
Hanna, Kathleen M., Scott, Linda L., Schmidt, Karen K.·2014·Clinical Nurse Specialist

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report was to describe retention strategies that were useful and those that were not in a longitudinal study of emerging adults. BACKGROUND: A longitudinal study examining the transition to young adulthood among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes, which had success in retention, provided the context for describing retention strategies. RATIONALE: A challenge in longitudinally designed studies is retention of participants because the loss decreases power for statistical analysis. Given that emerging adulthood is a period of instability, retention is particularly challenging among this population. However, longitudinal studies are the best way to understand developmental changes, and it is also important to increase our knowledge of health outcomes during emerging adulthood. DESCRIPTION: Retention strategies used in the study are described, including promoting a positive relationship with participants, maintaining contact with participants, having a study staff with good interpersonal skills, using incentives, conveying respect for participants, and using user-friendly data collection. OUTCOMES: Useful strategies to promote a positive relationship included sending cards and newsletters to participants, maintaining consistency of contact person, and expressing appreciation for participant's time and effort. Useful strategies for maintaining contact with participants included obtaining contact information at every data collection point, maintaining birth dates and chart numbers in tracking databases, monitoring returned mail, and using Web search engines. Other useful strategies were providing incentives to participants, employing staff with good interpersonal skills, providing participants with choices when appropriate, and using user-friendly data collection. One strategy, using contests, was not found useful. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges of conducting longitudinally designed studies with emerging adults, multiple retention strategies can be used that are useful to retention. IMPLICATIONS: It is feasible to conduct longitudinal studies with emerging adults despite the challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nur.0000000000000020

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Program engagement and retention are expected challenges with transition-age youth in general and with remote delivery.

    “Program engagement and retention are expected challenges with transition-age youth in general (Kim et al., 2012) and with remote delivery as well (Hanna et al., 2014; Murray et al., 2009; Watson et al., 2018).”

    From Intervention development to improve foster youth mental health by targeting coping self-efficacy and help-seeking (2023) · cites this paper as Hanna et al., 2014

    The Abstract (Implications) says retention in longitudinal studies is especially challenging for emerging adults. The Discussion describes Web-based questionnaires as useful and less burdensome, but does not establish that remote delivery itself creates engagement or retention challenges for a program. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Polit DF Beck CT Nursing Research: Genrating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice 2008 Wolters Kluwer / Lippincott Williams & Wilken Philadelphia 8th ed
  2. [10]Furstenberg FF Jr. Rumbaut RC Settersten RA Jr. Settersten RA Furstenberg FF Rumbaut RG On the frontier of adulthood: Emerging themes and new directions On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy 2005 3 25 The University of Chicago Press Chicago

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, K. M., Scott, L. L., & Schmidt, K. K.
Affiliations
National Institute of Nursing Research (US)
Corresponding author
Hanna, Kathleen M.
Venue
Clinical Nurse Specialist
Published
2014-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
41-45
ISSN
0887-6274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046393071
Cited by
72
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nurse Specialist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR009810)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
participant retention, retention strategies, emerging adults, longitudinal study, type 1 diabetes, transition to young adulthood, incentives
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Longitudinal Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review